STANDARD NETWORK ANALYSIS REPORT

STANDARD NETWORK ANALYSIS REPORT

Input data: Hi-tech

Start time: Mon Oct 17 14:11:18 2011

Data Description

Calculates common social network measures on each selected input network.

Network test

Network Level Measures

MeasureValue
Row count36.000
Column count36.000
Link count147.000
Density0.117
Components of 1 node (isolates)3
Components of 2 nodes (dyadic isolates)0
Components of 3 or more nodes1
Reciprocity0.615
Characteristic path length2.543
Clustering coefficient0.365
Network levels (diameter)6.000
Network fragmentation0.162
Krackhardt connectedness0.838
Krackhardt efficiency0.881
Krackhardt hierarchy0.171
Krackhardt upperboundedness0.994
Degree centralization0.300
Betweenness centralization0.141
Closeness centralization0.037
Eigenvector centralization0.416
Reciprocal (symmetric)?No (61% of the links are reciprocal)

Node Level Measures

MeasureMinMaxAvgStddev
Total degree centrality0.0000.4000.1170.094
Total degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00028.0008.1676.547
In-degree centrality0.0000.3430.1170.097
In-degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00012.0004.0833.378
Out-degree centrality0.0000.4570.1170.095
Out-degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00016.0004.0833.320
Eigenvector centrality0.0000.5750.1820.150
Eigenvector centrality [Unscaled]0.0000.4070.1290.106
Eigenvector centrality per component0.0000.3730.1180.097
Closeness centrality0.0280.1320.1140.027
Closeness centrality [Unscaled]0.0010.0040.0030.001
In-Closeness centrality0.0280.2080.1600.061
In-Closeness centrality [Unscaled]0.0010.0060.0050.002
Betweenness centrality0.0000.1710.0350.044
Betweenness centrality [Unscaled]0.000203.90041.13952.805
Hub centrality0.0000.6730.1740.159
Authority centrality0.0000.5100.1740.159
Information centrality0.0000.0470.0280.012
Information centrality [Unscaled]0.0002.1711.2860.562
Clique membership count0.00017.0003.1673.468
Simmelian ties0.0000.2860.0570.075
Simmelian ties [Unscaled]0.00010.0002.0002.614
Clustering coefficient0.0001.0000.3650.296

Key Nodes

This chart shows the Agent that is repeatedly top-ranked in the measures listed below. The value shown is the percentage of measures for which the Agent was ranked in the top three.

Total degree centrality

The Total Degree Centrality of a node is the normalized sum of its row and column degrees. Individuals or organizations who are "in the know" are those who are linked to many others and so, by virtue of their position have access to the ideas, thoughts, beliefs of many others. Individuals who are "in the know" are identified by degree centrality in the relevant social network. Those who are ranked high on this metrics have more connections to others in the same network. The scientific name of this measure is total degree centrality and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 36, density: 0.116667)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1Chris0.40028.0005.296
2Tom0.28620.0003.160
3Rick0.28620.0003.160
4Ken0.22916.0002.092
5Dale0.21415.0001.825
6Gerry0.21415.0001.825
7Irv0.21415.0001.825
8Steve0.20014.0001.558
9Mel0.18613.0001.291
10Hugh0.18613.0001.291

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.117Mean in random network: 0.117
Std.dev: 0.094Std.dev in random network: 0.054

Back to top

In-degree centrality

The In Degree Centrality of a node is its normalized in-degree. For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the in-links are the connections that the node of interest receives from other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of in-links a piece of knowledge has is the number of agents that are connected to. The scientific name of this measure is in-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1Chris0.34312.000
2Rick0.31411.000
3Tom0.28610.000
4Ken0.2579.000
5Dale0.2298.000
6Steve0.2298.000
7Gerry0.2298.000
8Irv0.2298.000
9Bob0.1716.000
10Mel0.1716.000

Back to top

Out-degree centrality

For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the out-links are the connections that the node of interest sends to other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of out-links an agent would have is the number of pieces of knowledge it is connected to. The scientific name of this measure is out-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in most knowledge have more expertise or are associated with more types of knowledge than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to knowledge exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by knowledge matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in "most resources" have more resources or are associated with more types of resources than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to resources exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by resource matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1Chris0.45716.000
2Tom0.28610.000
3Rick0.2579.000
4Dale0.2007.000
5Ken0.2007.000
6Mel0.2007.000
7Nan0.2007.000
8Gerry0.2007.000
9Hugh0.2007.000
10Irv0.2007.000

Back to top

Eigenvector centrality

Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Leaders of strong cliques are individuals who or organizations who are collected to others that are themselves highly connected to each other. In other words, if you have a clique then the individual most connected to others in the clique and other cliques, is the leader of the clique. Individuals or organizations who are connected to many otherwise isolated individuals or organizations will have a much lower score in this measure then those that are connected to groups that have many connections themselves. The scientific name of this measure is eigenvector centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 36, density: 0.116667)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1Chris0.5750.4070.460
2Rick0.4800.3400.113
3Tom0.4450.314-0.018
4Ken0.3910.276-0.215
5Gerry0.3890.275-0.221
6Hugh0.3700.262-0.291
7Dale0.3230.229-0.462
8Nan0.3200.227-0.474
9Upton0.2680.189-0.666
10Mel0.2550.180-0.714

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.182Mean in random network: 0.450
Std.dev: 0.150Std.dev in random network: 0.273

Back to top

Eigenvector centrality per component

Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Each component is extracted as a separate network, Eigenvector Centrality is computed on it and scaled according to the component size. The scores are then combined into a single result vector.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1Chris0.373
2Rick0.311
3Tom0.288
4Ken0.253
5Gerry0.252
6Hugh0.240
7Dale0.210
8Nan0.208
9Upton0.174
10Mel0.165

Back to top

Closeness centrality

The average closeness of a node to the other nodes in a network (also called out-closeness). Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network from the node to all other nodes.

Input network: test (size: 36, density: 0.116667)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1Chris0.1320.004-3.501
2Earl0.1300.004-3.531
3Dale0.1290.004-3.554
4Tom0.1290.004-3.554
5Rick0.1280.004-3.561
6Gerry0.1280.004-3.561
7Mel0.1270.004-3.576
8Irv0.1270.004-3.583
9Hugh0.1260.004-3.597
10Ken0.1250.004-3.604

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.114Mean in random network: 0.357
Std.dev: 0.027Std.dev in random network: 0.064

Back to top

In-Closeness centrality

The average closeness of a node from the other nodes in a network. Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network to the node and from all other nodes.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1Rick0.2080.006
2Tom0.2060.006
3Chris0.2060.006
4Dale0.2050.006
5Gerry0.2050.006
6Irv0.2030.006
7Steve0.2010.006
8Upton0.2010.006
9Ken0.1980.006
10Mel0.1980.006

Back to top

Betweenness centrality

The Betweenness Centrality of node v in a network is defined as: across all node pairs that have a shortest path containing v, the percentage that pass through v. Individuals or organizations that are potentially influential are positioned to broker connections between groups and to bring to bear the influence of one group on another or serve as a gatekeeper between groups. This agent occurs on many of the shortest paths between other agents. The scientific name of this measure is betweenness centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 36, density: 0.116667)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1Chris0.171203.9003.475
2Irv0.142169.1872.643
3Steve0.105124.7021.577
4Rick0.091108.6481.192
5Tom0.088104.7531.099
6Dale0.085101.6201.024
7Bob0.07690.8000.765
8Gerry0.07589.1490.725
9Pat0.06475.9320.408
10Mel0.06375.1630.390

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.035Mean in random network: 0.049
Std.dev: 0.044Std.dev in random network: 0.035

Back to top

Hub centrality

A node is hub-central to the extent that its out-links are to nodes that have many in-links. Individuals or organizations that act as hubs are sending information to a wide range of others each of whom has many others reporting to them. Technically, an agent is hub-central if its out-links are to agents that have many other agents sending links to them. The scientific name of this measure is hub centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1Chris0.673
2Tom0.471
3Hugh0.413
4Gerry0.402
5Rick0.391
6Dale0.349
7Ken0.348
8Nan0.316
9Mel0.305
10Dan0.240

Back to top

Authority centrality

A node is authority-central to the extent that its in-links are from nodes that have many out-links. Individuals or organizations that act as authorities are receiving information from a wide range of others each of whom sends information to a large number of others. Technically, an agent is authority-central if its in-links are from agents that have are sending links to many others. The scientific name of this measure is authority centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1Rick0.510
2Chris0.498
3Tom0.479
4Ken0.475
5Gerry0.396
6Dale0.357
7Hugh0.322
8Mel0.294
9Nan0.287
10Bob0.247

Back to top

Information centrality

Calculate the Stephenson and Zelen information centrality measure for each node.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1Chris0.0472.171
2Tom0.0431.993
3Rick0.0431.972
4Gerry0.0401.850
5Mel0.0401.842
6Nan0.0401.836
7Dale0.0391.824
8Hugh0.0391.824
9Ken0.0391.804
10Irv0.0391.789

Back to top

Clique membership count

The number of distinct cliques to which each node belongs. Individuals or organizations who are high in number of cliques are those that belong to a large number of distinct cliques. A clique is defined as a group of three or more actors that have many connections to each other and relatively fewer connections to those in other groups. The scientific name of this measure is clique count and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1Chris17.000
2Rick11.000
3Steve9.000
4Tom7.000
5Irv6.000
6Dale5.000
7Ken5.000
8Nan5.000
9Upton5.000
10Gerry5.000

Back to top

Simmelian ties

The normalized number of Simmelian ties of each node.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1Chris0.28610.000
2Tom0.2007.000
3Ken0.1716.000
4Rick0.1716.000
5Dale0.1435.000
6Gerry0.1435.000
7Hugh0.1435.000
8Mel0.1144.000
9Nan0.1144.000
10Steve0.1144.000

Back to top

Clustering coefficient

Measures the degree of clustering in a network by averaging the clustering coefficient of each node, which is defined as the density of the node's ego network.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1Ev1.000
2Vic1.000
3Walt1.000
4Earl1.000
5Gary0.667
6Ovid0.667
7Alex0.667
8Ivo0.583
9Hugh0.554
10Hal0.500

Back to top

Key Nodes Table

This shows the top scoring nodes side-by-side for selected measures.

RankBetweenness centralityCloseness centralityEigenvector centralityEigenvector centrality per componentIn-degree centralityIn-Closeness centralityOut-degree centralityTotal degree centrality
1ChrisChrisChrisChrisChrisRickChrisChris
2IrvEarlRickRickRickTomTomTom
3SteveDaleTomTomTomChrisRickRick
4RickTomKenKenKenDaleDaleKen
5TomRickGerryGerryDaleGerryKenDale
6DaleGerryHughHughSteveIrvMelGerry
7BobMelDaleDaleGerrySteveNanIrv
8GerryIrvNanNanIrvUptonGerrySteve
9PatHughUptonUptonBobKenHughMel
10MelKenMelMelMelMelIrvHugh

Produced by ORA developed at CASOS - Carnegie Mellon University