STANDARD NETWORK ANALYSIS REPORT

STANDARD NETWORK ANALYSIS REPORT

Input data: Scotland

Start time: Tue Oct 18 11:34:57 2011

Data Description

Calculates common social network measures on each selected input network.

Network test

Network Level Measures

MeasureValue
Row count153.000
Column count153.000
Link count326.000
Density0.028
Components of 1 node (isolates)11
Components of 2 nodes (dyadic isolates)0
Components of 3 or more nodes1
Reciprocity1.000
Characteristic path length3.173
Clustering coefficient0.113
Network levels (diameter)8.000
Network fragmentation0.139
Krackhardt connectedness0.861
Krackhardt efficiency0.981
Krackhardt hierarchy0.000
Krackhardt upperboundedness1.000
Degree centralization0.243
Betweenness centralization0.316
Closeness centralization0.022
Eigenvector centralization0.560
Reciprocal (symmetric)?Yes

Node Level Measures

MeasureMinMaxAvgStddev
Total degree centrality0.0000.2680.0280.034
Total degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00041.0004.2355.195
In-degree centrality0.0000.2680.0280.034
In-degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00041.0004.2355.195
Out-degree centrality0.0000.2680.0280.034
Out-degree centrality [Unscaled]0.00041.0004.2355.195
Eigenvector centrality0.0000.6260.0740.087
Eigenvector centrality [Unscaled]0.0000.4430.0520.062
Eigenvector centrality per component0.0000.4110.0480.057
Closeness centrality0.0070.0780.0670.017
Closeness centrality [Unscaled]0.0000.0010.0000.000
In-Closeness centrality0.0070.0780.0670.017
In-Closeness centrality [Unscaled]0.0000.0010.0000.000
Betweenness centrality0.0000.3260.0120.034
Betweenness centrality [Unscaled]0.0003745.290142.196395.624
Hub centrality0.0000.6260.0740.087
Authority centrality0.0000.6260.0740.087
Information centrality0.0000.0120.0070.003
Information centrality [Unscaled]0.0001.8530.9940.418
Clique membership count0.00027.0001.1443.431
Simmelian ties0.0000.1640.0090.022
Simmelian ties [Unscaled]0.00025.0001.3733.302
Clustering coefficient0.0001.0000.1130.198

Key Nodes

This chart shows the Agent that is repeatedly top-ranked in the measures listed below. The value shown is the percentage of measures for which the Agent was ranked in the top three.

Total degree centrality

The Total Degree Centrality of a node is the normalized sum of its row and column degrees. Individuals or organizations who are "in the know" are those who are linked to many others and so, by virtue of their position have access to the ideas, thoughts, beliefs of many others. Individuals who are "in the know" are identified by degree centrality in the relevant social network. Those who are ranked high on this metrics have more connections to others in the same network. The scientific name of this measure is total degree centrality and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 153, density: 0.0276717)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1&0.26841.00018.121
2railway0.22935.00015.164
3british0.12419.0007.278
4of0.11818.0006.785
5scotland0.10516.0005.799
6north0.09815.0005.306
7bank0.09815.0005.306
8iron0.08513.0004.321
9scottish0.08513.0004.321
10tea0.07211.0003.335

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.028Mean in random network: 0.028
Std.dev: 0.034Std.dev in random network: 0.013

Back to top

In-degree centrality

The In Degree Centrality of a node is its normalized in-degree. For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the in-links are the connections that the node of interest receives from other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of in-links a piece of knowledge has is the number of agents that are connected to. The scientific name of this measure is in-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1&0.26841.000
2railway0.22935.000
3british0.12419.000
4of0.11818.000
5scotland0.10516.000
6north0.09815.000
7bank0.09815.000
8iron0.08513.000
9scottish0.08513.000
10tea0.07211.000

Back to top

Out-degree centrality

For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the out-links are the connections that the node of interest sends to other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of out-links an agent would have is the number of pieces of knowledge it is connected to. The scientific name of this measure is out-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in most knowledge have more expertise or are associated with more types of knowledge than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to knowledge exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by knowledge matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in "most resources" have more resources or are associated with more types of resources than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to resources exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by resource matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1&0.26841.000
2railway0.22935.000
3british0.12419.000
4of0.11818.000
5scotland0.10516.000
6north0.09815.000
7bank0.09815.000
8iron0.08513.000
9scottish0.08513.000
10tea0.07211.000

Back to top

Eigenvector centrality

Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Leaders of strong cliques are individuals who or organizations who are collected to others that are themselves highly connected to each other. In other words, if you have a clique then the individual most connected to others in the clique and other cliques, is the leader of the clique. Individuals or organizations who are connected to many otherwise isolated individuals or organizations will have a much lower score in this measure then those that are connected to groups that have many connections themselves. The scientific name of this measure is eigenvector centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 153, density: 0.0276717)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1&0.6260.443-2.946
2railway0.5300.374-3.449
3british0.3790.268-4.233
4bank0.2580.183-4.858
5of0.2520.178-4.890
6line0.2510.177-4.897
7iron0.2470.174-4.919
8power0.2330.165-4.991
9scottish0.2300.163-5.005
10north0.2270.161-5.019

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.074Mean in random network: 1.194
Std.dev: 0.087Std.dev in random network: 0.192

Back to top

Eigenvector centrality per component

Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Each component is extracted as a separate network, Eigenvector Centrality is computed on it and scaled according to the component size. The scores are then combined into a single result vector.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1&0.411
2railway0.348
3british0.249
4bank0.170
5of0.166
6line0.165
7iron0.162
8power0.153
9scottish0.151
10north0.149

Back to top

Closeness centrality

The average closeness of a node to the other nodes in a network (also called out-closeness). Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network from the node to all other nodes.

Input network: test (size: 153, density: 0.0276717)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1&0.0780.001-46.867
2railway0.0770.001-47.450
3british0.0760.000-48.659
4iron0.0760.000-48.938
5bank0.0750.000-49.076
6scotland0.0750.000-49.283
7power0.0750.000-49.352
8of0.0750.000-49.386
9line0.0750.000-49.625
10north0.0750.000-49.659

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.067Mean in random network: 0.128
Std.dev: 0.017Std.dev in random network: 0.001

Back to top

In-Closeness centrality

The average closeness of a node from the other nodes in a network. Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network to the node and from all other nodes.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1&0.0780.001
2railway0.0770.001
3british0.0760.000
4iron0.0760.000
5bank0.0750.000
6scotland0.0750.000
7power0.0750.000
8of0.0750.000
9line0.0750.000
10north0.0750.000

Back to top

Betweenness centrality

The Betweenness Centrality of node v in a network is defined as: across all node pairs that have a shortest path containing v, the percentage that pass through v. Individuals or organizations that are potentially influential are positioned to broker connections between groups and to bring to bear the influence of one group on another or serve as a gatekeeper between groups. This agent occurs on many of the shortest paths between other agents. The scientific name of this measure is betweenness centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network: test (size: 153, density: 0.0276717)

RankAgentValueUnscaledContext*
1&0.3263745.2904.442
2railway0.2252586.0682.990
3scotland0.084967.7810.963
4british0.083954.7700.947
5iron0.070800.9960.754
6bank0.061698.7350.626
7north0.056647.4480.562
8of0.051583.3310.482
9glasgow0.047537.5340.424
10nobel's0.046525.6750.410

* Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density

Mean: 0.012Mean in random network: 0.017
Std.dev: 0.034Std.dev in random network: 0.070

Back to top

Hub centrality

A node is hub-central to the extent that its out-links are to nodes that have many in-links. Individuals or organizations that act as hubs are sending information to a wide range of others each of whom has many others reporting to them. Technically, an agent is hub-central if its out-links are to agents that have many other agents sending links to them. The scientific name of this measure is hub centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1&0.626
2railway0.530
3british0.379
4bank0.258
5of0.252
6line0.251
7iron0.247
8power0.233
9scottish0.230
10north0.227

Back to top

Authority centrality

A node is authority-central to the extent that its in-links are from nodes that have many out-links. Individuals or organizations that act as authorities are receiving information from a wide range of others each of whom sends information to a large number of others. Technically, an agent is authority-central if its in-links are from agents that have are sending links to many others. The scientific name of this measure is authority centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1&0.626
2railway0.530
3british0.379
4bank0.258
5of0.252
6line0.251
7iron0.247
8power0.233
9scottish0.230
10north0.227

Back to top

Information centrality

Calculate the Stephenson and Zelen information centrality measure for each node.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1&0.0121.853
2railway0.0121.823
3british0.0111.737
4of0.0111.727
5scotland0.0111.708
6bank0.0111.689
7north0.0111.686
8scottish0.0111.657
9iron0.0111.651
10line0.0111.609

Back to top

Clique membership count

The number of distinct cliques to which each node belongs. Individuals or organizations who are high in number of cliques are those that belong to a large number of distinct cliques. A clique is defined as a group of three or more actors that have many connections to each other and relatively fewer connections to those in other groups. The scientific name of this measure is clique count and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1&27.000
2railway24.000
3british14.000
4scottish10.000
5line8.000
6bank8.000
7iron7.000
8north6.000
9of4.000
10scotland4.000

Back to top

Simmelian ties

The normalized number of Simmelian ties of each node.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValueUnscaled
1&0.16425.000
2railway0.13220.000
3british0.08613.000
4scottish0.06610.000
5bank0.0599.000
6north0.0538.000
7iron0.0538.000
8line0.0538.000
9power0.0396.000
10of0.0335.000

Back to top

Clustering coefficient

Measures the degree of clustering in a network by averaging the clustering coefficient of each node, which is defined as the density of the node's ego network.

Input network(s): test

RankAgentValue
1bridge1.000
2sulphur1.000
3(henderson1.000
4motors1.000
5refining0.667
6engineering0.667
7david0.500
8allan0.400
9younger0.333
10dewar0.333

Back to top

Key Nodes Table

This shows the top scoring nodes side-by-side for selected measures.

RankBetweenness centralityCloseness centralityEigenvector centralityEigenvector centrality per componentIn-degree centralityIn-Closeness centralityOut-degree centralityTotal degree centrality
1&&&&&&&&
2railwayrailwayrailwayrailwayrailwayrailwayrailwayrailway
3scotlandbritishbritishbritishbritishbritishbritishbritish
4britishironbankbankofironofof
5ironbankofofscotlandbankscotlandscotland
6bankscotlandlinelinenorthscotlandnorthnorth
7northpowerironironbankpowerbankbank
8ofofpowerpowerironofironiron
9glasgowlinescottishscottishscottishlinescottishscottish
10nobel'snorthnorthnorthteanorthteatea

Produced by ORA developed at CASOS - Carnegie Mellon University