Input data: THURM
Start time: Tue Oct 18 12:00:52 2011
Network Level Measures
Measure Value Row count 15.000 Column count 15.000 Link count 33.000 Density 0.314 Components of 1 node (isolates) 0 Components of 2 nodes (dyadic isolates) 0 Components of 3 or more nodes 1 Reciprocity 1.000 Characteristic path length 1.876 Clustering coefficient 0.413 Network levels (diameter) 3.000 Network fragmentation 0.000 Krackhardt connectedness 1.000 Krackhardt efficiency 0.791 Krackhardt hierarchy 0.000 Krackhardt upperboundedness 1.000 Degree centralization 0.297 Betweenness centralization 0.366 Closeness centralization 0.342 Eigenvector centralization 0.320 Reciprocal (symmetric)? Yes Node Level Measures
Measure Min Max Avg Stddev Total degree centrality 0.071 0.571 0.314 0.175 Total degree centrality [Unscaled] 1.000 8.000 4.400 2.444 In-degree centrality 0.071 0.571 0.314 0.175 In-degree centrality [Unscaled] 1.000 8.000 4.400 2.444 Out-degree centrality 0.071 0.571 0.314 0.175 Out-degree centrality [Unscaled] 1.000 8.000 4.400 2.444 Eigenvector centrality 0.062 0.588 0.310 0.192 Eigenvector centrality [Unscaled] 0.044 0.416 0.219 0.136 Eigenvector centrality per component 0.044 0.416 0.219 0.136 Closeness centrality 0.424 0.700 0.546 0.087 Closeness centrality [Unscaled] 0.030 0.050 0.039 0.006 In-Closeness centrality 0.424 0.700 0.546 0.087 In-Closeness centrality [Unscaled] 0.030 0.050 0.039 0.006 Betweenness centrality 0.000 0.409 0.067 0.105 Betweenness centrality [Unscaled] 0.000 37.248 6.133 9.591 Hub centrality 0.062 0.588 0.310 0.192 Authority centrality 0.062 0.588 0.310 0.192 Information centrality 0.033 0.090 0.067 0.018 Information centrality [Unscaled] 0.724 1.942 1.443 0.395 Clique membership count 0.000 3.000 1.133 0.957 Simmelian ties 0.000 0.500 0.229 0.177 Simmelian ties [Unscaled] 0.000 7.000 3.200 2.482 Clustering coefficient 0.000 1.000 0.413 0.346 Key Nodes
This chart shows the Agent that is repeatedly top-ranked in the measures listed below. The value shown is the percentage of measures for which the Agent was ranked in the top three.
Total degree centrality
The Total Degree Centrality of a node is the normalized sum of its row and column degrees. Individuals or organizations who are "in the know" are those who are linked to many others and so, by virtue of their position have access to the ideas, thoughts, beliefs of many others. Individuals who are "in the know" are identified by degree centrality in the relevant social network. Those who are ranked high on this metrics have more connections to others in the same network. The scientific name of this measure is total degree centrality and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.
Input network: THURM (size: 15, density: 0.314286)
Rank Agent Value Unscaled Context* 1 ANN 0.571 8.000 2.145 2 PETE 0.571 8.000 2.145 3 EMMA 0.571 8.000 2.145 4 LISA 0.500 7.000 1.549 5 AMY 0.429 6.000 0.953 6 KATY 0.357 5.000 0.358 7 TINA 0.357 5.000 0.358 8 PRESIDENT 0.286 4.000 -0.238 9 BILL 0.214 3.000 -0.834 10 ANDY 0.214 3.000 -0.834 * Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density
Mean: 0.314 Mean in random network: 0.314 Std.dev: 0.175 Std.dev in random network: 0.120 In-degree centrality
The In Degree Centrality of a node is its normalized in-degree. For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the in-links are the connections that the node of interest receives from other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of in-links a piece of knowledge has is the number of agents that are connected to. The scientific name of this measure is in-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value Unscaled 1 ANN 0.571 8.000 2 PETE 0.571 8.000 3 EMMA 0.571 8.000 4 LISA 0.500 7.000 5 AMY 0.429 6.000 6 KATY 0.357 5.000 7 TINA 0.357 5.000 8 PRESIDENT 0.286 4.000 9 BILL 0.214 3.000 10 ANDY 0.214 3.000 Out-degree centrality
For any node, e.g. an individual or a resource, the out-links are the connections that the node of interest sends to other nodes. For example, imagine an agent by knowledge matrix then the number of out-links an agent would have is the number of pieces of knowledge it is connected to. The scientific name of this measure is out-degree and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in most knowledge have more expertise or are associated with more types of knowledge than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to knowledge exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by knowledge matrices. Individuals or organizations who are high in "most resources" have more resources or are associated with more types of resources than are others. If no sub-network connecting agents to resources exists, then this measure will not be calculated. The scientific name of this measure is out degree centrality and it is calculated on agent by resource matrices.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value Unscaled 1 ANN 0.571 8.000 2 PETE 0.571 8.000 3 EMMA 0.571 8.000 4 LISA 0.500 7.000 5 AMY 0.429 6.000 6 KATY 0.357 5.000 7 TINA 0.357 5.000 8 PRESIDENT 0.286 4.000 9 BILL 0.214 3.000 10 ANDY 0.214 3.000 Eigenvector centrality
Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Leaders of strong cliques are individuals who or organizations who are collected to others that are themselves highly connected to each other. In other words, if you have a clique then the individual most connected to others in the clique and other cliques, is the leader of the clique. Individuals or organizations who are connected to many otherwise isolated individuals or organizations will have a much lower score in this measure then those that are connected to groups that have many connections themselves. The scientific name of this measure is eigenvector centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.
Input network: THURM (size: 15, density: 0.314286)
Rank Agent Value Unscaled Context* 1 PETE 0.588 0.416 0.062 2 LISA 0.567 0.401 -0.014 3 ANN 0.561 0.397 -0.035 4 AMY 0.479 0.339 -0.327 5 KATY 0.461 0.326 -0.394 6 TINA 0.461 0.326 -0.394 7 PRESIDENT 0.360 0.254 -0.756 8 EMMA 0.358 0.253 -0.760 9 MARY 0.159 0.113 -1.473 10 ROSE 0.159 0.113 -1.473 * Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density
Mean: 0.310 Mean in random network: 0.571 Std.dev: 0.192 Std.dev in random network: 0.279 Eigenvector centrality per component
Calculates the principal eigenvector of the network. A node is central to the extent that its neighbors are central. Each component is extracted as a separate network, Eigenvector Centrality is computed on it and scaled according to the component size. The scores are then combined into a single result vector.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value 1 PETE 0.416 2 LISA 0.401 3 ANN 0.397 4 AMY 0.339 5 KATY 0.326 6 TINA 0.326 7 PRESIDENT 0.254 8 EMMA 0.253 9 MARY 0.113 10 ROSE 0.113 Closeness centrality
The average closeness of a node to the other nodes in a network (also called out-closeness). Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network from the node to all other nodes.
Input network: THURM (size: 15, density: 0.314286)
Rank Agent Value Unscaled Context* 1 PETE 0.700 0.050 1.356 2 EMMA 0.700 0.050 1.356 3 LISA 0.667 0.048 0.930 4 ANN 0.609 0.043 0.190 5 AMY 0.583 0.042 -0.134 6 PRESIDENT 0.560 0.040 -0.432 7 KATY 0.538 0.038 -0.707 8 TINA 0.538 0.038 -0.707 9 MINNA 0.500 0.036 -1.198 10 MARY 0.500 0.036 -1.198 * Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density
Mean: 0.546 Mean in random network: 0.594 Std.dev: 0.087 Std.dev in random network: 0.078 In-Closeness centrality
The average closeness of a node from the other nodes in a network. Loosely, Closeness is the inverse of the average distance in the network to the node and from all other nodes.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value Unscaled 1 PETE 0.700 0.050 2 EMMA 0.700 0.050 3 LISA 0.667 0.048 4 ANN 0.609 0.043 5 AMY 0.583 0.042 6 PRESIDENT 0.560 0.040 7 KATY 0.538 0.038 8 TINA 0.538 0.038 9 MINNA 0.500 0.036 10 MARY 0.500 0.036 Betweenness centrality
The Betweenness Centrality of node v in a network is defined as: across all node pairs that have a shortest path containing v, the percentage that pass through v. Individuals or organizations that are potentially influential are positioned to broker connections between groups and to bring to bear the influence of one group on another or serve as a gatekeeper between groups. This agent occurs on many of the shortest paths between other agents. The scientific name of this measure is betweenness centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.
Input network: THURM (size: 15, density: 0.314286)
Rank Agent Value Unscaled Context* 1 EMMA 0.409 37.248 8.648 2 PETE 0.177 16.119 2.721 3 ANN 0.136 12.367 1.668 4 LISA 0.076 6.943 0.147 5 AMY 0.074 6.743 0.091 6 MINNA 0.070 6.367 -0.015 7 BILL 0.024 2.143 -1.199 8 ANDY 0.020 1.843 -1.284 9 PRESIDENT 0.008 0.743 -1.592 10 MARY 0.008 0.743 -1.592 * Number of standard deviations from the mean of a random network of the same size and density
Mean: 0.067 Mean in random network: 0.071 Std.dev: 0.105 Std.dev in random network: 0.039 Hub centrality
A node is hub-central to the extent that its out-links are to nodes that have many in-links. Individuals or organizations that act as hubs are sending information to a wide range of others each of whom has many others reporting to them. Technically, an agent is hub-central if its out-links are to agents that have many other agents sending links to them. The scientific name of this measure is hub centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value 1 PETE 0.588 2 LISA 0.567 3 ANN 0.561 4 AMY 0.479 5 KATY 0.461 6 TINA 0.461 7 PRESIDENT 0.360 8 EMMA 0.358 9 MARY 0.159 10 ROSE 0.159 Authority centrality
A node is authority-central to the extent that its in-links are from nodes that have many out-links. Individuals or organizations that act as authorities are receiving information from a wide range of others each of whom sends information to a large number of others. Technically, an agent is authority-central if its in-links are from agents that have are sending links to many others. The scientific name of this measure is authority centrality and it is calculated on agent by agent matrices.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value 1 PETE 0.588 2 LISA 0.567 3 ANN 0.561 4 AMY 0.479 5 KATY 0.461 6 TINA 0.461 7 PRESIDENT 0.360 8 EMMA 0.358 9 MARY 0.159 10 ROSE 0.159 Information centrality
Calculate the Stephenson and Zelen information centrality measure for each node.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value Unscaled 1 EMMA 0.090 1.942 2 PETE 0.089 1.929 3 ANN 0.088 1.895 4 LISA 0.085 1.837 5 AMY 0.081 1.744 6 TINA 0.075 1.621 7 KATY 0.075 1.621 8 PRESIDENT 0.072 1.569 9 MINNA 0.058 1.266 10 ANDY 0.058 1.250 Clique membership count
The number of distinct cliques to which each node belongs. Individuals or organizations who are high in number of cliques are those that belong to a large number of distinct cliques. A clique is defined as a group of three or more actors that have many connections to each other and relatively fewer connections to those in other groups. The scientific name of this measure is clique count and it is calculated on the agent by agent matrices.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value 1 PETE 3.000 2 LISA 3.000 3 ANN 2.000 4 PRESIDENT 2.000 5 AMY 1.000 6 KATY 1.000 7 BILL 1.000 8 TINA 1.000 9 ANDY 1.000 10 MINNA 1.000 Simmelian ties
The normalized number of Simmelian ties of each node.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value Unscaled 1 PETE 0.500 7.000 2 LISA 0.500 7.000 3 ANN 0.429 6.000 4 AMY 0.357 5.000 5 KATY 0.357 5.000 6 TINA 0.357 5.000 7 PRESIDENT 0.286 4.000 8 EMMA 0.214 3.000 9 BILL 0.143 2.000 10 ANDY 0.143 2.000 Clustering coefficient
Measures the degree of clustering in a network by averaging the clustering coefficient of each node, which is defined as the density of the node's ego network.
Input network(s): THURM
Rank Agent Value 1 KATY 1.000 2 TINA 1.000 3 PRESIDENT 0.833 4 AMY 0.667 5 LISA 0.667 6 PETE 0.500 7 ANN 0.429 8 BILL 0.333 9 ANDY 0.333 10 MINNA 0.333 Key Nodes Table
This shows the top scoring nodes side-by-side for selected measures.
Rank Betweenness centrality Closeness centrality Eigenvector centrality Eigenvector centrality per component In-degree centrality In-Closeness centrality Out-degree centrality Total degree centrality 1 EMMA PETE PETE PETE ANN PETE ANN ANN 2 PETE EMMA LISA LISA PETE EMMA PETE PETE 3 ANN LISA ANN ANN EMMA LISA EMMA EMMA 4 LISA ANN AMY AMY LISA ANN LISA LISA 5 AMY AMY KATY KATY AMY AMY AMY AMY 6 MINNA PRESIDENT TINA TINA KATY PRESIDENT KATY KATY 7 BILL KATY PRESIDENT PRESIDENT TINA KATY TINA TINA 8 ANDY TINA EMMA EMMA PRESIDENT TINA PRESIDENT PRESIDENT 9 PRESIDENT MINNA MARY MARY BILL MINNA BILL BILL 10 MARY MARY ROSE ROSE ANDY MARY ANDY ANDY