Automap Graphical User Interface (GUI)
Load Input5.2 Create
a Delete List
5.3 Edit a Delete List
5.4 Apply a Delete Lis
5.4.1 Direct Adjacency
5.4.2 Rhetorical Adjacency
5.5 Un-apply
Delete List
5.6 Save a Delete List
5.7 Save text(s) after application of Delete List
5.8 Example for the Application of a Delete List
Further
Information
How
to cite AutoMap
Questions, Bugs, and Comments
References
AutoMap is a software tool to analyze text using the method of Network Text Analysis. It performs a specific type of Network Text Analysis called Semantic Network Analysis. Semantic analysis extracts and analyzes links among words to model an authors “mental map” as a network of links. Additionally, Automap supports Content Analysis.
Coding in AutoMap is computer-assisted; the software applies a set of coding rules specified by the user in order to code the texts as networks of concepts. Coding texts as maps focuses the user on investigating meaning among texts by finding relationships among words and themes.
The coding rules in AutoMap involve text pre-processing and statement formation, which together form the coding scheme. Text pre-processing condenses data into concepts, which capture the features of the texts relevant to the user. Statement formation rules determine how to link concepts into statements.
Listed below are the steps a user would follow (in typical order) to use AutoMap:
NTA theory is based on the assumption that language and knowledge can be modeled as networks of words and relations. Network Text Analysis encodes links among words to construct a network of linkages. Specifically, Network Text Analysis analyzes the existence, frequencies, and covariance of terms and themes, thus subsuming classical Content Analysis.
In map analysis, a concept is a single idea, or ideational kernel, represented by one or more words. Concepts are equivalent to nodes in Social Network Analysis (SNA). The link between two concepts is referred to as a statement, which corresponds with an edge in SNA. The relation between two concepts can differ in strength, directionality, and type. The union of all statements per texts forms a semantic map. Maps are equivalent to networks.
Social
Network Analysis is a scientific area focused on the study of relations,
often defined as social networks. In its basic form, a social network
is a network where the nodes are people and the relations (also called
links or ties) are a form of connection such as friendship. Social
Network Analysis takes graph theoretic ideas and applies them to the
social world. The term "social network" was first coined in 1954 by J.
A. Barnes (see: Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish). Social
network analysis is also called network analysis, structural analysis,
and the study of human relations. SNA is often referred to as the science
of "connecting the dots."
Today, the term Social
Network Analysis (or SNA) is used to refer to the analysis of any network
such that all the nodes are of one type (e.g., all people, or all roles,
or all organizations), or at most two types (e.g., people and the groups
they belong to). The metrics and tools in this area, since they are
based on the mathematics of graph theory, are applicable regardless of the
type of nodes in the network or the reason for the connections.
For most researchers,
the nodes are actors. As such, a network can be a cell of terrorists,
employees of global company or simply a group of friends. However,
nodes are not limited to actors. A series of computers that interact
with each other or a group of interconnected libraries can comprise a network
also.
Where to find out more on SNA?
Dynamic Network Analysis (DNA) is an emergent scientific field that brings together traditional social network analysis (SNA), link analysis (LA) and multi-agent systems (MAS). There are two aspects of this field. The first is the statistical analysis of DNA data. The second is the utilization of simulation to address issues of network dynamics. DNA networks vary from traditional social networks in that are larger dynamic multi-mode, multi-plex networks, and may contain varying levels of uncertainty.
DNA statistical tools are generally optimized for large-scale networks and admit the analysis of multiple networks simultaneously in which, there are multiple types of nodes (multi-node) and multiple types of links (multi-plex).In contrast, SNA statistical tools focus on single or at most two mode data and facilitate the analysis of only one type of link at a time.
DNA statistical tools tend to provide more measures to the user, because they have measures that use data drawn from multiple networks simultaneously. From a computer simulation perspective, nodes in DNA are like atoms in quantum theory, nodes can be, though need not be, treated as probabilistic. Whereas nodes in a traditional SNA model are static, nodes in a DNA model have the ability to learn. Properties change over time; nodes can adapt: A company's employees can learn new skills and increase their value to the network; Or, kill one terrorist and three more are forced to improvise. Change propagates from one node to the next and so on. DNA adds the critical element of a network's evolution and considers the circumstances under which change is likely to occur.
Automap Graphical User Interface
AutoMap's graphical user interface (GUI) is divided into four primary quadrants (or panels): they will be referred to as P1 (top left), P2 (bottom left), P3 (top right) and P4 (bottom right).
The drop-down menu bar provides access to various analysis tools and utilities. The browse menu bar allows you to quickly navigate between loaded texts.
Index cards, or "tabs," provide a tabular interface allowing you to navigate each panel respectively. The GUI reads any changes dynamically from the XML file. To do that, the user needs to refresh the tool.
The screen shot below highlights primary features of the Automap GUI and where to find them:
It is important to note that P2 can be edited. The other panels (P1, P3, P4) cannot be edited. Information displayed on P1 to P4 always relates to each other. The Text Browse Menu relates to all panels at the same time.
Window sizes do not have an upper threshold. AutoMap will automatically set window size to largest text size upon user’s request. This is a new button on the Analysis Settings panel. This enables text set specific maximum window sizes, which also enhances efficiency.
The Action Tracer Panel in P4 will log preprocessing utilities applied to your text. This is a handy way to keep track of changes and actions relating to your text.
In the various pre-processing panels, such as utilities, "tool tips," provide more information on certain routines. Tool tips become visible when you slide he mouse over that particular tool.
This user's guide provides illustrative examples for all AutoMap functions. The sample texts below will be used throughout this guide.
Tip! it is suggested you follow along using the examples below. To do so, simply copy and paste the texts below into wordpad or notepad and save as a .txt file in the same folder.
| Our Text Example |
|
| Our Text Example II |
|
Load Input
To open a single text file into Automap, proceed as follows from the Automap menu bar:
File Open > Open single file
A file chooser will pop up (screen shot below).
Double click on the file that you wish to analyze > Select the Open button.
The text will be displayed in P1 on tab No. 1. Original Text.
The loading of .TXT files (caps) is now enabled.
Should you wish to analyze multiple texts at the same time, they must be stored in one folder. To do so, proceed as follows from the Automap menu bar:
File menu > Open multiple files
After you select "Open multiple files" a folder chooser will pop up. Again, be sure that correct folder is selected in the folder chooser. The black ellipses in the screen shot below highlight where you should be looking in the file chooser:
Choose the folder that contains the texts you wish to analyze and single click on it. The folder will be highlighted. Do not double click on the folder. Select the Open button (see above screen shot). The first text will be displayed in panel P1, tab no. 1. Original Text . You can browse through the texts by using the Browse Menu.
Text Analysis Utilities
Automap contains text analysis utilities to help you in the pre-processing and data analysis of your text examples. Take time to become familiar with them as they allow you to quickly work with your text examples.
1. Browse through texts
This function enables you to quickly jump from text example to another. All panels are
synchronized in the Browse Menu. A series of screen shots below the instruction ad emphasis on how to access text Automap's text browsing features.
How to use the Browse Menu:
To go backward or forward text by text:
Click the ">" button or the "<" button in the browse menu bar.
To go to first or last text in the text set:
Click the ">>" button or the" <<" button.
To go to a specific text:
Enter the text number in text field right next to the Go to command and hit OK.
The name of the currently selected text is displayed on the Browse menu.
These files can be browsed:
The example shows a part of the Our Text 1.txt in panel P1
tab no. 1 Original Texts.
The browse menu tells you several important facts:
2. Concept List
The Concept List is displayed in panel P2 tab No. 1 Concept List.
The Concept List is created automatically once a text or a set of texts are
loaded or modified in Automap.
The concept list tells you several important facts about your text:
Tip! The number of unique concepts considers each concept only once, whereas the number of total concepts considers repetitions of concepts.
By default, the Concept List is sorted by decreasing frequency of concepts. To sort the list alphabetically, click on the first-column header Concept. In order to resort the list, click on the header of the second-column header Frequency.
2.1 Example for Concept List
The example below shows a part of the Concept List for the text displayed
in the browse menu. The Table
is ordered by Frequency. The concept list contains more entries than the interface
can display:
3. Create and refresh Union Concept List
The Union Concept List, found in panel P2, differs from the Concept List (tab no. 1) in that it considers concepts across all texts loaded in Automap, rather than one single text file. There are several key pieces of information the Union Concept List tells you:
Union Concept List results are displayed on tab No. 2 Union Concept List in P2. However, you must first refresh the union concept list from the file menu, before viewing your results on the o. 2 Union Concept tab. The union concept list can be refreshed after each step of pre-processing in order to visualize the impact of pre-processing operations on the union of concepts.
To refresh the Union Concept, from the drop-down menu bar:
File menu > Refresh Union Concept List.
The ellipse in the screen shot below shows were to access the Refresh Union Concept List from the drop-down menu bar:
The call out box in the screen shot below, shows where to locate the Union Concept tab, which will contain the results of the Refresh Union Concept List analysis:
Your results will be displayed in tab No 2. Union Concept List. The black ellipse in the screen shot below highlights where to find this tab in the Automap GUI.
By default, the list is sorted by decreasing frequency of concepts. In order to sort the list alphabetically click on the first-column header Concept. To re-sort the list, click on the second-header column Frequency.
Note: The number of unique concepts considers each concept only once, whereas the number of total concepts also considers repetitions of concepts.
To save a Union Concept List follow these steps:
File menu > Save Union Concept List.
A file chooser will pop up. The black ellipse below highlights how to save a Union Concept List from the drop-down menu bar.
3.2 Example for Union Concept List
Let us walk through an example of creating a Union Concept List working with our text examples from above. They are restated below for you convenience:
1) Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye putup a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
2) Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating the lotus blossom at 12 pm the next day. Mrs. Brown was now happy with the dog. She said "You good dog!" The dog no longer ate the flowers and weeds. Mr. Cray was pleased too.
Mrs. Brown watered the roses and fertilized the garden on June 13, 1880.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner and discussed how the plan had worked. John Darren and Mrs. Brown would take down the scarecrow the following week. She thought it was too scarry for the dog. Mr. Craye painted his fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
The first step is to load in your multiple texts from which we will create and save a Union Concept List. An empty AutoMap GUI is shown below before any text is loaded into it. This is what you will see when you first run AutoMap:
From the drop-down menu:
File > Open Multiple Files > (select location of folder on applicaple drive containing your text examples)
Select "Open"
The screen shot below displays the Automap GUI after our text examples have been loaded into it.
To run the Create and Refresh Union Concept Utility based on multiple texts:
File > Create and Refresh Union Concept List
The following series of screen shots present a step-by-step on how to create an refresh a union concept list:
Select "Save Union Concept List" from the drop-down menu:
The result is shown in the screen shot below:
The table is ordered by Frequency. The concept list contains
more entries than the interface can display.
The displayed Union Concept List indicates there are 100 unique concepts
and 229 total concepts in the data set.
Text Pre-Processing
1. Introduction to Text Pre-Processing in AutoMap
Pre-processing reduces the data to terms relevant
to you.
Tip! All pre-processing techniques in AutoMap are optional.
There are some points to consider before you begin Pre-Processing:
Pre-processing is semi-automated and iterative and involves several key processes:
Named-Entity Recognition is an Automap feature that allows you to retrieve proper names (e.g. names of people, organizations, places), numerals, and abbreviations from texts (Magnini, Negri, Prevete & Tanev, 2002). The AutoMap Named-Entity Recognition functionality detects:
Stemming detects inflections and derivations of concepts in order to convert each concept into the related morpheme (Jurafsky & Martin, p.83, 654). AutoMap offers 2 stemmers:
A word's collocates are words appearing next to or near to it.
Tip! Collocations occuring with high frequency are powerful indicators of a pattern of meaning in a text.
Collocations are helpful to construct thesauri in AutoMap. AutoMap can identify collocations of size 2 (Bigrams) as shown below:
Deletion removes non-content bearing conjunctions and articles from texts (Carley, 1993). Non-content bearing concepts to be deleted from the texts are denoted in a Delete List. When applying a Delete List, AutoMap searches the text(s) for concepts specified in the Delete List and delete matches from the text(s). Example:
A thesaurus associates concepts with more abstract concepts. When applying a thesaurus, AutoMap searches the text set for the text-level concepts denoted in the thesaurus and translates matches into the corresponding concept. The terminology of a thesaurus depends on the content and the subject of the data set (Burkart, 1997: 163; Zuell & Alexa, 2001: 313).
Generalization Thesaurus.
A generalization thesaurus typically is a two-columned collection that associates text-level concepts with higher-level concepts. The text-level concepts represent the content of a data set, and the higher-level concepts represent the text-level concepts in a generalized way (Burkart, 1997; Klein 1997: 256; Popping & Roberts 1997: 382).
A Meta-Matrix Thesaurus associates text-level concepts with meta-matrix categories. Since one concept might need to be translated into several meta-matrix categories, a meta-matrix thesaurus can consist of more than two columns. For example, the concept “commander” corresponds with the categories agent and knowledge.
For the meta-matrix thesaurus, column headers start with concept knowledge. The order AND naming of column headers of the meta-matrix thesaurus can be changed in the XML file.
Sub-Matrix Selection. The Sub-Matrix Selection denotes which Meta-Matrix Categories should be retranslated into concepts used as input for the meta-matrix thesaurus.
2. Hierarchy of Pre-Processing Techniques
If you apply a pre-processing technique of a lower order prior to a technique of higher order, the pre-processing will be maintained through all following procedures of higher order. You can un-apply each technique after applying it, if needed.
Tip! All pre-processing techniques are optional.
If you wish to apply multiple pre-processing techniques, do this in the following order:
| Numbering of index card tabs on P1: | |
| Numbering of index card tabs on P2: |
3. NLP Utilities
3.1 Named-Entity Recognition
More information about Named-Entity Recognition in AutoMap.
To create a list of all Name-Entities that are contained in the data set opened,
go to Utilities (tab no. 3) in P2 and
click the Create
and save Named Entities List button in the Named-Entities Field. The
resulting list will be automatically saved under NamedEntities.csv in the root
directory of AutoMap.
| The Named-Entity Recognition interface: |
The black ellipses in the screen shot below below highlight where to find the NamedEntities.csv file in your root directory.
3.1.1 Example for Named-Entity Recognition
Resulting NamedEntities.csv
file a
|
|
Redundant concepts can be converted to one word by stemming. Concepts not relevant to the user can be eliminated by deletion.
In the lower left panel (P2) you will find an option under tab no. 3 Pre-Processing Utilities labeled on tab no. 1 as Symbol Removal. This routine removes or strips off all characters that are neither a letter nor a number. It maintains sentence marks. It converts question marks and exclamation marks into sentence marks. This helps replace the delchar option on the delete list in a more user-friendly fashion. The overall purpose of this routine is to do a very thorough cleaning of the data in a fully automated, easy to use fashion. This routine can be unapplied by using the “un-apply” button, which is located close the “apply” button.
3.21 N-gram Identification: Bigrams
More information about Collocation Identification
in AutoMap.
To create a list of all bigrams that are contained in the data set opened,
go to the Utilities, tab no. 3, in P2 and select the Create
Bigram (Correlation)
List button in the N-gram Detection. The
resulting list will be automatically saved under CorrelationList.csv in the
root directory of AutoMap.
4. Stemming
More information about Stemming.
To stem a text (or text set), go to the Stemming (tab no. 4) in P2.
Porter Stemmer:
To apply the Porter Stemmer select the Apply button next
to Porter Stemmer and stemming of irregular verbs for English. The stemmed
text(s) will be displayed on the tab no. 2 Stemmed Text in P1.
To unstem the texts, go to tab no. 4. Stemming
in P2 and select the Un-Apply button. Tab
no. 2. Stemmed Text in P1 will be cleared.
Krovetz Stemmer:
For the Krovetz stemmer, several customization options are offered:
Use radio buttons in the interface to make your selection. By default, capitalized words are stemmed.
These words are collected in a protection list, named selfdefined_protected_concepts.txt, stored in the AutoMap root directory under utilities\KStem. To avoid stemming certain words put them in this list, one word per line, without any line delimiter.
These words are collected in a list of pairwise associations, named selfdefined_pairs.txt, which are stored in the AutoMap root directory under utilities\KStem. To stem a certain word into a pre-defined term, put the pair (first word / pre-defined stem) in the list, one pair per line, without any line delimiter. The selfdefined_pairs.txt list that comes along with AutoMap contains already such pairs, which handle the correct stemming or irregular verbs in English.
To apply the Krovetz stemmer:
Select the Apply button next to K-stem. The stemmed text(s)
will be displayed on tab no. 2.
Stemmed Text index card in P1.
To unstem the texts, go to the tab no. 4 Stemming in P2 and
select the Un-Apply button. The tab no. 2 Stemmed Text in P1 will
be cleared.
4.1 Example for Stemming (Porter)
| Stemmed text in P1 and interface of Stemming index card on P2: |
5. Deletion
The Delete List is not case sensitive.
More information about Deletion in AutoMap.
You can use the predefined Delete Lists that AutoMap offers or create your
own Delete List. All lists can be edited.
5.1 Open a Delete
List
Click the File menu, select Open Delete List and choose
one of the following options:
Open from file. A file chooser will appear. Select a delete list and hit the Open button.
Open small predefined Delete List. AutoMap's predefined small delete list will be opened.
Open extensive predefined Delete List. AutoMap's extensive small delete list will be opened.
The black ellipses in the screen shot below shows where to access the Delete List utility:
The Delete List will be displayed in P2, tab no. 5. Delete List index card:
| Interface of the Delete List index card: |
The Delete List can be edited.
5.1.1 Small predefined Delete List
The Delete List is compiled of words that occur most
frequently in English: a, an,
and, some,
many,
this,
that,
these,
those,
the,
all,
one,
every.
The Small Delete List can be edited.
5.1.2 Extensive predefined Delete List
An Extensive Delete List is based on words occurring most
frequently in English: a, an, and, as, at, but, for,
he, her, hers, him, his, i, it, its, me, mine, my, nor, of, or, our, she, so,
that,
the, their, theirs, them,
they,
to, us, we, who, whoever, whom, whomever, will, would, you,
your, yours, yourself. As the name indicates, the Extensive Delete list contains more words than the Small Predefined Delete List.
The Extensive Delete List can be edited.
5.2 Create a Delete List
There are two ways to create a Delete List:
1. Within AutoMap:
Go to the Delete List index
card.
The general structure of a Delete List is one single concept per
line. Add concepts by typing one concept per line. Hit enter after entering
a concept. Avoid empty lines. See the example for
more information.
2. Outside of AutoMap:
Use a text editor to create a Delete List.
Please consider these instructions to create a Delete List:
5.3. Edit a Delete List
On the Delete List index card you can:
5.4 Apply a Delete List
If you wish to apply a Delete List and a Thesaurus we recommend
first applying a Delete List and then
a Thesaurus. Next, follow these steps:
When applying a Delete List AutoMap does three things:
If rhetorical adjacency was chosen placeholders (xxx) are inserted where a concept was deleted. The placeholders retain original distances of maintained concepts for purposes of visualization and analysis.
To apply multiple delete lists load the first one in, apply it, then load in the next, apply it, and so on.
5.4.1 Direct Adjacency
If direct adjacency is chosen, concepts in the text that match concepts specified
in the delete list will be
deleted from texts. As a result concepts
left
and right
of a deleted
concept move together and will be treated
as directly
adjacent to each other for visualization
and analysis.
To apply direct adjacency check
the radio button in the Delete List index
card. Then apply the
delete list.
If the user does not change the adjacency
option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency for
deletion and analysis.
5.4.2 Rhetorical adjacency
If rhetorical adjacency is chosen placeholders "xxx" are inserted
where a concept was deleted. The
placeholders retain the
original distances
of the maintained concepts visually for
analysis.
To apply direct adjacency check the button on the Delete List tab.
Then apply the
delete list.
If the user does not change the adjacency
option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency for
deletion and analysis.
5.5 Un-Apply a Delete List
To un-apply a Delete List that was applied to the data, in P2
go to the Delete List (tab no. 5) index card and
select the Un-Apply button.
The tab no. 3 Delete List index
card on P1 will be cleared.
5.6 Save an applied Delete List
To save a Delete List that you have applied
to the data, click the File menu, select Save
Delete
List as. A file chooser will pop up.
5.7 Save text(s) after application of Delete List
To save the text(s) after the application of the Delete List, click
the File
menu,
select Save
Text(s) after Delete List applied. All texts are automatically saved
in a folder called "preprocessed" in the root directory of AutoMap. The filename
will be "after_DL_NameOfYourText.txt".
5.8 Examples for the application of a Delete List
| Input text | Tool used | Setting | Resulting text |
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
|
AutoMap's extensive Delete List: a, an, and, as, at, but, for, he, her, hers, him, his, i, it, its, me, mine, my, nor, of, or, our, she, so, that, the, their, theirs, them, they, to, us, we, who, whoever, whom, whomever, will, would, you, your, yours, yourself |
Direct Adjacency (default) | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses. |
| Rhetorical Adjacency | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate xxx lotus blossom xxx 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with xxx dog. xxx yelled xxx xxx saying "You impossible dog!" xxx xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx asked Mr. Cray xxx stop xxx dog. xxx couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses xxx weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking xxx xxx vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met xxx next day xxx concoct xxx plan. John Darren xxx Mrs. Brown put up xxx scarecrow. xxx thought xxx xxx scare xxx dog. Mr. Craye put up xxx fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. | ||
The following
concepts were added to the Delete List. Then the Delete List was applied
again. |
Direct Adjacency (default) | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown unhappy dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses. | |
| Rhetorical Adjacency | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate xxx lotus blossom xxx 10 am. Mrs. Brown xxx unhappy xxx xxx dog. xxx yelled xxx xxx saying "You impossible dog!" xxx xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx asked Mr. Cray xxx stop xxx dog. xxx couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses xxx weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking xxx xxx vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding xxx no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met xxx next day xxx concoct xxx plan. John Darren xxx Mrs. Brown put up xxx scarecrow. xxx thought xxx xxx scare xxx dog. Mr. Craye put up xxx fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. |
6. Generalization
Thesaurus
More information about thesauri.
The Generalization Thesaurus is not case sensitive.
6.1. Open a Generalization Thesaurus
Click the File menu, select
Open Generalization Thesaurus. A file chooser will pop up. Double click
the thesaurus you wish to wish
to open or single click the thesaurus and then hit the Open button.
The
thesaurus will
be
displayed
on P2, 6. Generalization
Thesaurus index card.
6.2. Create a Generalization Thesaurus
There are two ways to create a Thesaurus:
1. Within AutoMap:
Go to P2, (tab no. 6) Generalization Thesaurus (see
also the interface of the Generalization
Thesaurus index card for an example).
Use the Text Area on this Index card.
Build and edit a thesaurus.
AutoMap supports users in building a generalization thesaurus by loading the union of concepts from the highest level of pre-processing applied into the Generalization Thesaurus field. This is found on the Generalization Thesaurus index card and can be used upon demand.
Follow these steps to load the union concept list into the Generalization Thesaurus field:
This concept list loaded into AutoMap can be refined by applying Named-Entity
Recognition and Deletion prior to Generalization.
Here is an example for multi-step
pre-processing:
To further illustrate multi-step pre-processing techniques, copy the text passages below, then save as a TXT file as "Our Text I.txt" and "Our Text II.txt " respectivley. Load these examples into Automap to follow along.
Input texts:
Our Text I.txt
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
Our Text II.txt:
Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating the lotus blossom at 12 pm the next day. Mrs. Brown was now happy with the dog. She said "You good dog!" The dog no longer ate the flowers and weeds. Mr. Cray was pleased too. Mrs. Brown watered the roses and fertilized the garden on June 13, 1880. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner and discussed how the plan had worked. John Darren and Mrs. Brown would take down the scarecrow the following week. She thought it was too scary for the dog. Mr. Craye painted his fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
| Pre-processing technique applied | Entries |
Result | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Create Named-Entity List. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Create Named-Entity List and use it to build a generalization thesaurus. | Mr. Cray's/Mr. Craye Mr. Craye/Mr. Cray's |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Add further words that belong together to the generalization thesaurus. | Prof. Darren/Prof_Darren |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Apply generalization thesaurus (no thesaurus content only). | mr. craye brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. mrs. brown was unhappy with the dog. she yelled at it saying "you impossible dog!" but the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. she asked mr. cray to stop the dog. he couldn't. mrs. brown planted roses and weeded the garden. the silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on june 12, 1880. weeding was no longer needed. mrs. brown & mr. cray, mrs. brown & mr. cray met the next day to concoct a plan. john darren and mrs. brown put up a scarecrow. she thought it would scare the dog. mr. cray's put up a fence. problem solved. brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Deletion (rhetorical adjacency). | a |
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate xxx lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with xxx dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop xxx dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking for xxx vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Create Union Concept List. | (Coincides with Union Concept List loaded into AutoMap, see cell below) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. Load Union Concept List into AutoMap. |
|
Outside of AutoMap:
Use a text editor to create a Thesaurus.
Build and edit a thesaurus.
Save the Thesaurus.
Open the
Thesaurus in AutoMap.
You can edit the Thesaurus in AutoMap if
you wish.
6.3 Edit a Generalization Thesaurus
You can add, change or drop the lines of a thesaurus on P2, (tab no. 6) Generalization Thesaurus.
The general structure of a Thesaurus follows the five points below (see also the interface of the Generalization Thesaurus index card for an example):
6.4 Apply a Generalization Thesaurus
If you wish to apply a Delete List and a Generalization Thesaurus please be sure to use the Delete List first and then the Thesaurus. Then go through the following process:
6.4.1 Thesaurus content only
If the Thesaurus content only option is chosen AutoMap performs the
following steps:
To select the Thesaurus content only option check the Thesaurus content only item on P2, (tab no. 6.) Generalization Thesaurus index card. You can now choose to either use direct or rhetorical adjacency for the application of the Generalization Thesaurus. Then apply the Generalization Thesaurus. To switch from not using the Thesaurus content only option uncheck the Thesaurus content only item on P2, (tab no. 6.) Generalization Thesaurus and apply the Generalization Thesaurus again.
If the Thesaurus content only option is NOT chosen AutoMap performs the following steps:
The Thesaurus content only item on P2, (tab no. 6) Generalization Thesaurus index card by default is not checked because AutoMap does not apply the Thesaurus content only option. To switch to using the Thesaurus content only option check the Thesaurus content only item on P2, (tab no. 6) Generalization Thesaurus and then apply the Generalization Thesaurus again.
Direct adjacency means that original distances of concepts that represent the key concepts will neither be visualized nor considered for analysis.
To choose the direct adjacency click the Direct button in the Adjacency field on P2, (tab no. 6) Generalization Thesaurus index card. Then apply the Generalization Thesaurus. If the user does not change the adjacency option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency for generalization and analysis.
Rhetorical adjacency means that the original distance of key concepts will be considered for the analysis. Original distances of concepts that represent the key concepts will be visually symbolized by placeholders (xxx) and considered for analysis. Rhetorical adjacency can only be applied if the Thesaurus content only option was not chosen.
To choose the rhetorical adjacency
click the Rhetorical button
in the Adjacency field on P2, Generalization
Thesaurus (tab no. 6). Then apply the
Generalization Thesaurus.
If the user does not change the adjacency option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency
for analysis.
6.5 Un-Apply a Generalization Thesaurus
To un-apply a Generalization Thesaurus that was applied to the data, go to P2, Generalization Thesaurus (tab no. 6) and hit the Un-Apply button. The Generalization Thesaurus (Tab no. 4) on P1 will be cleared.
6.6 Save an applied Generalization Thesaurus
To save a Generalization Thesaurus that you have applied to the data, click
the File menu, select Save
Generalization Thesaurus As ( a file chooser will
pop up).
6.7 Save text(s) after application of Generalization Thesaurus
To save the text(s) after the application of the Generalization Thesaurus, click the File menu, select Save Text(s) after Generalization Thesaurus applied. All texts are automatically saved in a folder called "preprocessed" in the root directory of AutoMap. The filename will be after_general_thes_NameOfYourText.txt".
6.8 Example for the building and applying a Generalization Thesaurus
Applying a thesaurus to text that was not pre-processed
| Input text | Tool used | Setting | Resulting text |
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses. |
Mr Craye/Mr_Cray |
Not Selected - Thesaurus content only (default) | mr. cray's brown dog eating the lotus blossom at 10 am. mrs. brown was unhappy with the dog. she yelling at it saying "you impossible dog!" but the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. she asked mr. cray to stop the dog. he couldn't. mrs. brown planted roses and weeded the garden. the silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on june 12, 1880. weeding was no longer needed. prof. darren, mrs. brown & mr. cray met the next day to concoct a plan. prof_john_darren and mrs. brown put up a scarecrow. she thought it would scare the dog. mr. craye put up a fence. problem solved. then mrs. brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses. |
Thesaurus content only,
Direct Adjacency |
. eating... yelling......,.. .,... prof_john_darren.......,,,. | ||
| Selected - Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | xxx. xxx xxx xxx eating xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx yelling xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. prof_john_darren xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx, xxx, xxx, xxx xxx. |
Applying a thesaurus to text that was pre-processed with a Delete List, direct adjacency:
| Input text | Tool used | Setting | Resulting text |
Text after application of customized extensive delete list, direct adjacency: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
|
Thesaurus (same as above) |
Not selected - Thesaurus content only (default) | mr. cray's brown dog eating lotus blossom 10 am. mrs. brown was unhappy with dog. yelling saying "you impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked mr. cray stop dog. couldn't. mrs. brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on june 12, 1880. weeding was no longer needed. prof. darren, mrs. brown & mr. cray met next day concoct plan. prof_john_darren mrs. brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. mr. craye put up fence. problem solved. then mrs. brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses. |
Selected - Thesaurus content only, Direct Adjacency |
. eating... yelling......,.. .,... prof_john_darren.......,,,. |
||
| Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | xxx. xxx xxx xxx eating xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. yelling xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. prof_john_darren xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx, xxx, xxx, xxx. |
Applying a thesaurus to text that was pre-processed with a Delete List, rhetorical adjacency:
| Input text | Tool used | Setting | Resulting text |
Text after application of Customized extensive delete list, rhetorical adjacency: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate xxx lotus blossom xxx 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with xxx dog. xxx yelled xxx xxx saying "You impossible dog!" xxx xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx asked Mr. Cray xxx stop xxx dog. xxx couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses xxx weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking xxx xxx vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. |
Thesaurus (same as above) |
Not Selected - Thesaurus content only (default) | mr. cray's brown dog eating xxx lotus blossom xxx 10 am. mrs. brown was unhappy with xxx dog. xxx yelling xxx xxx saying "you impossible dog!" xxx xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx asked mr. cray xxx stop xxx dog. xxx couldn't. mrs. brown planted roses xxx weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking xxx xxx vole on june 12, 1880. weeding was no longer needed. prof. darren, mrs. brown & mr. cray met xxx next day xxx concoct xxx plan. prof_john_darren xxx mrs. brown put up xxx scarecrow. xxx thought xxx xxx scare xxx dog. mr. craye put up xxx fence. problem solved. then mrs. brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. |
Thesaurus content only, Direct Adjacency |
. eating... yelling......,.. .,... prof_john_darren.......,,,. |
||
| Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | xxx. xxx xxx xxx eating xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx yelling xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. prof_john_darren xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx, xxx, xxx, xxx xxx. |
7. Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
More
information about Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
A Meta-Matrix Thesaurus has to be applied if Meta-Matrix
Analysis should be performed.
A Meta-Matrix Thesaurus associates concepts with meta-matrix categories:
When applying a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus, AutoMap searches the text(s) for the entries specified in the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and translates matches into related Meta-Matrix categories. If you also want to apply a Delete List or/ and a Generalization Thesaurus you will need to apply these pre-processing tools before the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.The Meta-Matrix Thesaurus is not case sensitive.
You might also see the meta
matrix model as
implemented in AutoMap to better understand the meta-matrix.
7.1 Open a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
Click the File menu, select Open Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and choose Open from highest level of pre-processing.
The union of concepts after the highest level of pre-processing applied so far will be displayed in alphabetical order on P2, Meta-Matrix Thesaurus (tab no. 7) index card.
Note: The Meta-Matrix Thesaurus can be edited.
If you have a pre-defined Meta-Matrix Thesaurus available that matches
(some of) the concepts contained in the loaded Meta-Matrix Thesaurus you
can open
this file.
To do so, click the File
menu, select Open Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and
choose Open
from file.
If a concept contained in the pre-defined file matches a concept
in the currently opened Meta-Matrix Thesaurus the meta-matrix
categories assigned to this concept in the pre-defined file will
be automatically
assigned to the concept in the currently opened Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
Note: The pre-assigned Meta-Matrix Thesaurus can be edited.
7.2 Edit a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
To each concept that appears in the Concept column of the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus you can assign special categories:
7.3 Build a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
You can build
a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
outside of AutoMap by using
a text editor. Please
consider these instructions:
7.4 Apply a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
Meta-matrix pre-processing is a higher level of pre-processing than the application of a Delete List and a Generalization Thesaurus. Thus, if you also want to apply a Delete List or/ and a Generalization Thesaurus you will need to apply these pre-processing tools before the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
Follow this process:
7.4.1 Thesaurus content only
If the Thesaurus content only option is chosen AutoMap does the following:
To select the Thesaurus content only option check the Thesaurus content only item on P2, Meta-Matrix Thesaurus (tab no. 7). You can now choose to either direct (default) or rhetorical adjacency. Then apply the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus. In order to switch from using the Thesaurus content only option uncheck the Thesaurus content only item and apply the Thesaurus again.
If the Thesaurus content only option is NOT chosen AutoMap does the following:
AutoMap by default does not select the Thesaurus content only option. Therefore, the Thesaurus content only item on P2, Meta-Matrix Thesaurus (tab no. 7) by default is not checked. Just apply the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus. In order to switch to using the Thesaurus content only option check the Thesaurus content only item on P2, Meta-Matrix Thesaurus (tab no. 7) index card and then apply the Thesaurus again.
Direct adjacency means that original distances of concepts that represent the key concepts will neither be visualized nor considered for analysis.
To choose the direct adjacency
click the Direct button
in the Adjacency field
on P2, Meta-Matrix Thesaurus index card (tab no.
7). Then apply the
Meta-Matrix Thesaurus. If the user does not change the adjacency option,
AutoMap uses direct adjacency for analysis. As a result, only meta-matrix
categories are displayed on P1, Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus (tab no. 5) will be considered
for analysis. All meta-matrix tags in the resulting text appear
directly adjacent to each other.
7.4.1.2 Rhetorical Adjacency
Rhetorical adjacency can only be applied if the Thesaurus content only option
was not chosen.
To choose the rhetorical adjacency click the Rhetorical button
in the Adjacency field on P2, (tab no. 7) Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus. Then apply the
Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
If the user does not change the adjacency option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency
for analysis.
As a result, the meta-matrix tags and the rest of the text are displayed
on P1,
(tab no. 5) Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus and will be considered for analysis.
Original distances of meta-matrix tags that represent
the key concepts will be visually symbolized by placeholders (xxx)
and considered for analysis.
7.5 Un-Apply a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
To un-apply a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus that was applied to the data, go
to P2,
(tab. no. 7) Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and hit the Un-Apply button.
The tab no. 5 Meta-Matrix Thesaurus on P1 will
be cleared.
7.6 Save an applied Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
If you wish to save a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus you
first need to apply it.
To save the Thesaurus, click the File menu, select Save Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus as. A file chooser will pop up.
7.7 Save text(s) after application of Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
To save the text(s) after the application of the Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus,
click the File menu, select Save Text(s) after Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus applied. All texts are automatically saved in a
folder called "preprocessed" in the root directory of AutoMap. The filename
will be after_MMCatThes_NameOfYourText.txt".
7.8 Example for editing and applying a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus
An Extract from the Our Text I.txt was used as input:
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
The customized extensive Delete List was applied to this text. The resulting text looks like this:
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.
Then, open the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus by clicking the File menu, selecting Open Meta-Matrix Thesaurus, and choosing Open from highest level of pre-processing. The black ellipse in the screen shot below underscore how to open a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus from the file menu.
The union of concepts from the highest level of pre-processing will be displayed in alphabetical order on P2, tab no. 3 - Preprocessing Settings, tab no. 5 - Meta-Matrix Thesaurus. As we did not pre-process the text the original input sentence is used for input for the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
Furthermore, we have prepared a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus that we stored on our machine. This file looks like this:
Mr_Cray/agent
Mrs_Brown/agent
Prof_John_Darren/agent
dog/agent
flowers/resource
lotus/resource
roses/resource
carnations/resource
daffodils/resource
weeds/resource
weeds/task
planting/task
eating/task
yelling/task
met/task
We clicked the File menu, selected Open Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and
chose Open
from file.
AutoMap searched the opened Meta-Matrix Thesaurus for the words
contained in the prepared Thesaurus. When it found a match
it assigned the words in
the opened Thesaurus the Meta-Matrix categories that were assigned
to
the same concept
in the pre-defined file. Below is the result:
Now we edit the Thesaurus by modifying some of the pre-assignments (e.g., centre) and adding assignments for concepts not assigned to Meta-Matrix categories yet (e.g., contact, copenhagen). Not all concepts were associated with Meta-Matrix categories (e.g., mobile).
In the next step we applied the Apply Meta-Matrix Thesaurus with the following settings:
| Setting | Resulting text |
| Not Thesaurus content only (default) | mr . cray's brown < agent> < task> the < resource> blossom at 10 am . mrs . brown was unhappy with the < agent> . she < task> at it saying "you impossible dog!" but the < agent> kept < task> the < resource> and < task> . she asked mr . cray to stop the < agent> . he couldn't . mrs . brown planted < resource> and weeded the garden . the silly < agent> % dug up the < resource> looking for a vole on june 12 , 1880 . weeding was no longer needed . prof . darren , mrs . brown & mr . cray < task> the next day to concoct a plan . < agent> and mrs . brown put up a scarecrow . she thought it would scare the < agent> . mr . craye put up a fence . problem solved . then mrs . brown planted < resource> , < resource> , < resource> , and < resource> . |
Thesaurus content only, Direct Adjacency |
. < agent> < task> < resource> . . < agent> . < task> < agent> < task> < resource> < task> . . < agent> . . . < resource> . < agent> < resource> . . . . . < task> . < agent> . . < agent> . . . . . < resource> < resource> < resource> < resource> . |
| Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | xxx . xxx xxx < agent> < task> xxx < resource> xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx < agent> . xxx < task> xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx < agent> xxx < task> xxx < resource> xxx < task> . xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx < agent> . xxx xxx . xxx . xxx xxx < resource> xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx < agent> xxx xxx xxx xxx < resource> xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx . xxx < task> xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . < agent> xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx < agent> . xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx . xxx xxx . xxx xxx < resource> < resource> < resource> xxx < resource> . |
The Sub-Matrix
Selection enables the user to re-translate concepts represented by a Meta-Matrix
category in order to run Sub-Matrix
Analysis.
If input texts (no matter if they were pre-processed with a Delete list
or not) were used in order to generate the Concept List for the Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus,
concepts
represented by a Meta-Matrix category will be translated into text-level
concepts. If input texts (no matter if they were pre-processed with a Delete list
or not) were pre-processed with a Generalization Thesaurus before applying
the
Meta-Matrix Thesaurus, concepts represented by a Meta-Matrix category
will be translated into key concepts.
The Thesaurus content only option always automatically applies for the Sub-Matrix
Selection.
8.1 Select Sub-Matrix Categories|
Precondition: Sub-Matrix Selection can only be performed if Meta-Matrix
Thesaurus was applied.
There are 4 ways to select sub matrices:
8.1.1 If you do not have a sub matrix selection file available
Create and modify a sub matrix
selection.
8.1.2 If you do not have a sub matrix selection file available and
want to select the full meta matrix (means all cells in the meta matrix)
Go to the File menu, Select Open Sub-Matrix Selection,
click on Select Full Meta Matrix. AutoMap dynamically
generates all combinations of meta matrix categories as specified in the
meta matrix
thesaurus, including user-defined categories, that represent all cells
of the meta matrix and display these combinations in the left window on P2,
8. Sub-Matrix Selection.
You can modify this sub matrix
selection.
This is the full meta-matrix:
agent/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
knowledge/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
organization/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
task-event/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
resource/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
location/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
role/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
action/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
attribute/agent/knowledge/organization/task-event/resource/location/role/action/attribute
8.1.3 If you have a sub matrix selection file available
Go to the File menu, Select Open Sub-Matrix Selection,
click on Open from file.
You can modify this sub matrix selections.
8.1.4
If you want to write your own sub matrix selection file and load it into AutoMap:
Build your own sub matrix selection file
outside of AutoMap, save it in .txt format, and load it into AutoMap. Go to
the File menu, Select Open Sub-Matrix Selection,
click on Open from file. You can modify this
sub matrix selections.
8.2 Create or Modify Sub-Matrix Selection
Go to P2, 8. Sub-Matrix Selection, click on a Sub-Matrix category you wish to select and hit the > Add in same line button. The selected category appears in the right text field on P2, (tab no. 8) Sub-Matrix Selection.
You can select as many Sub-Matrix categories per row as you wish by clicking on a category in the left window on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection and move it to the right window by clicking the > Add in same line button. Additionally, you can select as many rows of sub matrix selections as you wish by clicking on a category in the left window on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection and move it to the right window by clicking the > Add in new line button. To add a further category to a new line, first single click on this category in the right window on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection, so that the category is highlighted in blue. To unselect a selected Sub-Matrix category, click on the row in the right window and hit the < Remove line button on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection. The row will disappear from the right window.
Tip!
8.3 Apply Sub-Matrix Selection
Direct adjacency means that original distances of concepts that represent meta-matrix categories will neither be visualized nor considered for analysis.
To choose the direct adjacency click the Direct button
in the Adjacency field
on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection index card.
Then apply the
Sub-Matrix Selection.
If the user does not change the adjacency option, AutoMap uses direct
adjacency for analysis.
As a result, only concepts that represent meta-matrix categories are
displayed on P1,
tab no. 6 Sub-Matrix Text index card and will be considered
for analysis. All concepts in the resulting text appear directly adjacent
to each
other.
8.3.2 Rhetorical Adjacency
To choose the rhetorical adjacency click the Rhetorical button in the Adjacency field on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection index card. Then apply the Sub-Matrix Selection. If the user does not change the adjacency option, AutoMap uses direct adjacency for analysis.
As a result, concepts that represent meta-matrix categories are displayed on P1, tab no. 6 Sub-Matrix Text and will be considered for analysis. Original distances of concepts that represent meta-matrix categories will be visually symbolized by placeholders (xxx) and considered for analysis.
8.4 Un-Apply a Sub-Matrix Selection
To un-apply
a Sub-Matrix Selection that was applied
to the data, go to P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection index
card and hit the Un-Apply button.
The tab no. 6 Sub-Matrix Text on P1 will
be cleared.
8.5 Save Sub-Matrix Selection
Apply the
Sub-Matrix Selection before you save it.
To save a Sub-Matrix Selection (the content of the right
window on P2, tab no. 8 Sub-Matrix Selection,
click the File menu, select Save applied Sub-Matrix
Selection as
applied.
8.6 Save text(s) after Sub-Matrix Selection
To save the text(s) after the application of the Sub-Matrix
Selection, click the File menu, select Save
Text(s) after Sub-Matrix Selection applied. All texts are automatically
saved in a folder called "preprocessed" in the root directory of
AutoMap. The filename will be after_SubMatrixSelection_NameOfYourText.txt".
8.7 Example for Sub-Matrix Selection
The Sub-Matrix Selection as shown here is based on the example
for the Meta-Matrix Thesaurus.
We opened P2, tab no. 3 - Pre-Processing Settings, tab no. 6- Sub-Matrix Selection.
Then we applied the Sub-Matrix Selection with the following settings:
| Setting | Resulting text |
Select: |
. dog.. dog. dog.. dog.... dog,.. .,... prof_john_darren.. dog.....,,,.
|
| Select: Agent/ Location/ Action Location/ Agent/ Action Action/ Location/ Agent Rhetorical Adjacency (see also next picture) |
xxx. xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. prof_john_darren xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx, xxx, xxx, xxx xxx. |
Select: Full Meta-matrix Direct Adjacency (default) |
. dog eating lotus.. dog. yelling dog eating flowers weeds.. dog... roses. dog roses,.. .,.. met. prof_john_darren.. dog..... lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses. |
| Select: Full Meta-matrix Rhetorical Adjacency (default) |
xxx. xxx xxx dog eating xxx lotus xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx yelling xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog xxx eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx roses xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx xxx roses xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx met xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. prof_john_darren xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. |
Statement Formation Choices
Statement formation choices can be made after pre-processing data and before running analysis. These choices define if, how, and where concepts will be linked. Statement formation settings will be applied to the highest level of data pre-processing that was applied. If no pre-processing was performed, statement formation settings apply to the original input text. If the user does not modify the statement formation settings AutoMap uses a set of default settings.
To specify the Analysis Settings or make the Analysis Settings, use the Analysis
Settings
Index
Card .
Your settings will be automatically applied in the analysis. You do not need
to confirm them.
If you do not want to change any of the suggested options a set of standard settings
will be applied. The screen shot below shows an example of the Automap Analysis Settings tab in P2.
Overview on the possible Settings:
| Coding Ties Specify the way statements are counted. |
Directionality Select one of the following two possibilities by checking the button. |
Uni-Directional (When coding a tie, only 1st->2nd concept should be noted) |
| Bi-Directional (When coding a tie, both 1st <-> 2nd concept shall be noted) | ||
Strength |
Frequency (The cumulative frequency of every
existing statement.) Item not checked: Existence of frequency will be printed out (binary result). |
|
Windowing |
Punctuation
|
Ignore punctuation completely (Statements will be placed between all concepts.) |
| Reset window at end of paragraphs only (Statements will be placed only within every single paragraph.) | ||
| Reset window at end of paragraphs and sentences (Statements will be placed only within every single sentence.) | ||
Window Size |
Window size between 2 and 100. The Window Size defines how distant concepts can be and still have a relation ship. Only concepts in same window can form statements. |
If you do not want to change any of the suggested options the analysis will be done with the following Standard Settings:
Output Options
The map and the statistic output generated by AutoMap are
displayed on P3 and P4, respectively. In addition to that AutoMap
offers further output options
that can be chosen on P2, 10. Output Options index card. All
additional outputs are only generated after analyses were run.
|
1. Term Distribution Lists and Matrices
Term distribution list and matrices as output options for all types of multiple analysis can be chosen in the upper two fields of P2, tab no. 10. Output Options.
Points To Consider
1.1 Types and content of Term Distribution Lists and Matrices
| Output Type | Name of output | Content of output | |
| Term Distribution List | Concepts analyzed | List of concept analyzed.csv |
Concept, Text, Frequency |
| Statistics of concepts analyzed.csv | Concept, Cumulated sum across text set, Number of text concept occurs in, Percentage of texts concept occurs in, Texts | ||
| Concepts in statements and isolates | List of concept in statements.csv |
Concept, Text, Frequency | |
| Statistics of concept in statements.csv | Concept, Cumulated sum across text set, Number of text concept occurs in, Percentage of texts concept occurs in, Texts | ||
| List of isolates in statements.csv | Concept, Text, Frequency | ||
| Statistics of isolates.csv | Concept, Cumulated sum across text set, Number of text concept occurs in, Percentage of texts concept occurs in, Texts | ||
| Statements | List of statements.csv | Statement, Text, Frequency | |
| Statistics of statements.csv | Statement, Cumulated sum across text set, Number of text statement occurs in, Percentage of texts statement occurs in, Texts | ||
| Term Distribution Matrices | Concepts in statements by concepts in statements: | ||
| Concepts in statements | Matrix of concepts in statements.csv | Matrix of Concept
that were linked into statements ( first row) by Concept that were
linked into statements (
first
column) |
|
| Term(s) by text(s): | |||
| Concepts analyzed | Matrix of concept analyzed.csv | Matrix of Concept (union of concepts listed in first
row) by texts (all text names listed in first column) |
|
| Concepts in statements and isolates | Matrix of concept in statements.csv | Matrix of Concept (union of concepts listed in first
row) by texts (all text names listed in first column) If count was chosen, cells contain cumulated frequency of concept If binary was chosen, cells denote existence (1) or absence (0) of concept |
|
| Statements | Matrix of statements.csv | Matrix of Statements (union of statements listed in
first row) by texts (all text names listed in first column) If count was chosen, cells contain cumulated frequency of statement If binary was chosen, cells denote existence (1) or absence (0) of statement |
|
1.2 Example for Term Distribution List and Matrices
Extracts from the Denmark.txt and USA.txt files were used as input:
Our Text 1.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
Our Text II.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating the lotus blossom at 12 pm the next day. Mrs. Brown was now happy with the dog. She said "You good dog!" The dog no longer ate the flowers and weeds. Mr. Cray was pleased too. Mrs. Brown watered the roses and fertilized the garden on June 13, 1880. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner and discussed how the plan had worked. John Darren and Mrs. Brown would take down the scarecrow the following week. She thought it was too scary for the dog. Mr. Craye painted his fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
Then AutoMap's Extensive Delete List, Direct Adjacency was applied to both texts. The Delete List was extended by further non-content bearing words that appeared in the sample texts (a an and as at awhile but for from happening he her her hers him his i in into it its me mine my nor of or our she so that the their theirs them they to us was we were what who whoever whom whomever will would you your yours yourself). Below is the resulting texts:
Our Text 1.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.
Our Text II.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating lotus blossom 12 pm next day. Mrs. Brown was now happy with dog. said "You good dog!" dog no longer ate flowers weeds. Mr. Cray was pleased too. Mrs. Brown watered roses fertilized garden on June 13, 1880. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner discussed how plan had worked. John Darren Mrs. Brown take down scarecrow following week. thought was too scary dog. Mr. Craye painted fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.
Then semantic network analysis was run on both texts using AutoMap's default settings. The black ellipse in the screen shot below shows how to run a Single Map Analysis (Semantic Network Analysis):
All outputs provided on the Output Options panel were checked. Again, the default settings were used. All output lists are saved in this folder (Term_Distribution_Lists_and_Matrices.zip).
2. Save Non-Identified concepts
Purpose: Save a list of all concepts that are remaining in the pre-processed
texts and that are not:
- Denoted in a delete list
- Denoted in any of the thesauri
To create a list of these words, go to on P2, tab no. 4 - Analysis Settings, tab no. 2 - Output Options index
card, select the Non-Identified Concepts field and check Save
list of Non-Identified Concepts. Run any type of Analysis.
The list will be stored under the root directory of AutoMap as Non_identified_concepts.csv. The black ellipse in the screen shot below shows where to find this option.
Two additional data formats are offered:
Note:
You can also user the Network Converter to convert data.
If maps and/or term distribution matrices are generated, these files can be additionally stored in the UCINET DL format.
Some points to consider when storing in UCINET DL Format:
Note: Since networks extracted with AutoMap are directed, matrices representing these networks can be rectangular. If a DL file needs to be generated from a rectangular matrix AutoMap by default squares this matrix before converting it into DL format.
3.2 DyNetML:
Results of Map Analysis and Sub-Matrix Text Analysis can be output in
DyNetML format.
Purpose: Generate DyNetML representation of maps (mental models) generated
with Map Analysis.
How to: Check the "per Map" checkbox on P2, 10. Output Options index
card, Additional Output Formats, DyNetML for Map Analysis.
Output: The resulting DyNetML files will be stored as NameOfText.xml
in the xml folder under the root directory
of AutoMap.
After Map Analysis:
By default, all entities in the applied ontology are considered as nodes,
and all statements between entities in the applied ontology (either in
anterior or posterior or both positions) are represented as edges in DyNetML.
The user is given the option to exclude entities of any applied ontology
from being considered as nodes and thus forming statements, but are considered
as attributes of other entities in the ontology that are forming
nodes and link into statements. An example would be the category "attribute",
which represent information that is inherent to a certain node.
The concept "teacher" or "male" e.g. might be considered
as attributes that relate to the entity agent. In order to use ontologies in
a way
ontologies that not only represent entities, but also features of entities.
do this follow this
procedure:
Note: Whether to use NTA or SNTA is a "text-philosophical question" and the answer depends upon what the user wants to measure: a textual network or a social network.
Run Sub-Matrix Text Analysis.
Two options for creating DyNetML files are offered.
Either one or both options can be selected per analysis:
1. Create one
DyNetML file per map and text. To do this, check per Text in
the Additional Output Formats field
on P2,
10. Output Options index card.
The DyNetML files will be stored as NameOfText.xml
and in a folder called xml under the root directory
of AutoMap.
2. Create one DyNetML file that unifies all maps. To do this, check per
TextSet in the Additional Output Formats field
on P2,
10. Output Options index card.
The DyNetML file will be stored as consolidated_map.xml in a folder called
xml under the root directory of AutoMap.
3.3 Examples for additional Output Formats
Extracts from the Our Text I.txt and Our Text II.txt files were used as input:
Our Text 1.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
Our Text II.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating the lotus blossom at 12 pm the next day. Mrs. Brown was now happy with the dog. She said "You good dog!" The dog no longer ate the flowers and weeds. Mr. Cray was pleased too. Mrs. Brown watered the roses and fertilized the garden on June 13, 1880. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner and discussed how the plan had worked. John Darren and Mrs. Brown would take down the scarecrow the following week. She thought it was too scary for the dog. Mr. Craye painted his fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
Then AutoMap's Extensive Delete List, Direct Adjacency was applied to both texts. The Delete List was extended by further non-content bearing words that appeared in the sample texts (a an and as at awhile but for from happening he her her hers him his i in into it its me mine my nor of or our she so that the their theirs them they to us was we were what who whoever whom whomever will would you your yours yourself). Resulting texts:
Our Text I.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.Our Text II.txt: Mr. Cray's brown dog stopped eating lotus blossom 12 pm next day. Mrs. Brown now happy with dog. said "You good dog!" dog no longer ate flowers weeds. Mr. Cray pleased too.
Mrs. Brown watered roses fertilized garden on June 13, 1880.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met over dinner discussed how plan had worked. John Darren Mrs. Brown take down scarecrow following week. thought too scary dog. Mr. Craye painted fence. Then Mrs. Brown watered lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.
Then map analysis was run on both texts using the AutoMap's default settings. All term distribution matrices provided on the Output Options panel were checked. Again, the default settings were used. The screen shot below shows the resulting analysis that should be displayed in P3.
AutoMap supports the computation of network analytic measures per map or network and per concept or node.
Note: Only Network Analytic Measures for directed networks were implemented into AutoMap. The reason for this is that AutoMap outputs are always directed in order to adequately represent the linear structure of texts.
To create measures follow these steps:
Note: Texts have a linear structure. Therefore, we only implemented Network Analytic Measures for directed networks (digraphs) into AutoMap.
The following Table explains the measures that can be computed:
Name of measure |
Calculation of measure |
Name of and reference for corresponding SNA measure |
Corresponding name of measure in Cube |
Concept (node) level measures, direct connectivity |
|||
Concept outdegree |
Total number of statements with concept in anterior position |
Outdegree, expansiveness, actor degree centrality (Wasserman & Faust 1994); Prestige, Influence (Mrvar) |
Local imageability |
Concept indegree |
Total number of statements with concept in posterior position
|
Indegree, receptivity, popularity, actor degree prestige (Wasserman & Faust 1994); Prestige, Support (Mrvar) |
Local evokability |
Concept outdegree centrality |
Total number of statements with concept in anterior position/ Number of unique concepts in text |
Outdegree Centrality (Wasserman & Faust 1994); Relative Influence (Mrvar) |
None |
Concept indegree centrality |
Total number of statements with concept in posterior position/ Number of unique concepts per text |
Indegree Centrality (Wasserman & Faust 1994); Relative Support (Mrvar) |
None |
Total degree |
Concept indegree + concept outdegree |
- |
Local density |
Map (graph) level measures, direct connectivity |
|||
Text outdegree centrality |
Sum (largest observed outdegree – outdegree of concepts)/( Number of unique concepts in text) 2 |
Group outdegree centralization (Wasserman & Faust, 1994) |
None
|
Mean concept outdegree centrality |
Sum (outdegree)/ Number of unique concepts in text |
Mean outdegree (= Mean indegree) (Wasserman & Faust 1994) |
None |
Variance of concept outdegree centrality |
Sum(sum outdegree – mean outdegree) 2 / Number of unique concepts in text |
Variance of outdegree (Wasserman & Faust 1994, p.127-128) |
None
|
Text indegree centrality |
Sum (largest observed indegree – indegree of concepts)/( Number of unique concepts in text) 2 |
Group indegree centralization (Wasserman & Faust, 1994) |
None
|
Mean concept indegree centrality |
Sum (indegree)/ Number of unique concepts in text |
Mean indegree (=Mean outdegree) |
None |
Variance of concept indegree centrality |
Sum (sum indegree – mean indegree) 2 / Number of unique concepts in text |
Variance of indegree (Wasserman & Faust 1994, p.127-128) |
None
|
Density |
Number of statements/ Possible number of statements |
Density (Wasserman & Faust 1994, p.129, Scott 1991, p.74) Wasserman and Faust use g(g-1) as denominator:, we use (g*g), because unique concept can form statement with same unique concept (e.g. agent-agent) |
None |
Concept (node) level measures, indirect connectivity |
|||
Concept closeness centrality
|
Minimum possible total distance from node i to all other nodes/ Sum of all geodesics between node i and all other nodes
|
Closeness (Wasserman & Faust, Mrvar) According to Wasserman and Faust (1994, p.200) group level closeness centrality is not computed |
None |
Concept betweenness centrality |
sum ((Number of all geodesics between all nodes that go through node i )/( Number of geodesics between node i and all other nodes))/(( Number of unique concepts in text -1)( Number of unique concepts in text -2)) |
Betweenness (Gould 1987, Mrvar) |
None |
Concept proximity prestige |
Number of concepts directly or indirectly adjacent to node i |
Proximity Prestige (Wasserman & Faust 1994, Mrvar) |
None |
Map (graph) level measures, indirect connectivity |
|||
Text Proximity Prestige |
Sum (Proximity Prestige (all unique concepts in text)/ Number of unique concepts in text |
Group level proximity prestige (Wasserman & Faust 1994) |
None |
Analyses
1. Semantic Network Analysis
Semantic Network Analysis can be run on original Input text(s) or texts that have been
pre-processed with a Delete List and/ or a Generalization thesaurus.
Before you run map analysis make sure that you have completed the following
steps:
If you wish to analyze a single text,
click the Run
Analysis menu and select Single
Map Analysis.
If you wish to analyze a set of texts,
click the Run Analysis menu and
select Multiple Map Analysis.
The Results will be displayed on P3 on the Map index card and on P4 on
the Stat index card.
If you had requested additional outputs, those will be generated and stored
under the directories specified under the Section Additional Outputs.
Other Semantic Network Analysis Points to Consider
Reporters said hundreds of people emerged from shops in Copenhagen city centre to see what was happening, and used their mobile phones to contact their families.
The text was pre-processed with AutoMap's customized extensive Delete List. These are the resulting texts:
| Input text | Tool used | Setting | Resulting text |
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses. |
AutoMap's customized extensive Delete List: a |
Direct Adjacency (default) | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate lotus blossom 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with dog. yelled saying "You impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds. asked Mr. Cray stop dog. couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses weeded garden. silly dog % dug up roses looking vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met next day concoct plan. John Darren Mrs. Brown put up scarecrow. thought scare dog. Mr. Craye put up fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.. |
| Rhetorical Adjacency | Mr. Cray's brown dog ate xxx lotus blossom xxx 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with xxx dog. xxx yelled xxx xxx saying "You impossible dog!" xxx xxx dog kept eating xxx flowers xxx weeds. xxx asked Mr. Cray xxx stop xxx dog. xxx couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses xxx weeded xxx garden. xxx silly dog % dug up xxx roses looking xxx xxx vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed. Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met xxx next day xxx concoct xxx plan. John Darren xxx Mrs. Brown put up xxx scarecrow. xxx thought xxx xxx scare xxx dog. Mr. Craye put up xxx fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. |
Next we run Map Analysis on both texts using AutoMap's default Analysis Settings.
| These are the Map and Statistics outputs for the first text (direct adjacency): | These are the Map and Statistics outputs for the second text (rhetorical adjacency): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Map:
|
Map:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stat: # of concepts analyzed: # of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
Stat: # of concepts analyzed: # of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
Note: For more information about the impact of coding choices on map analysis results you might have a look at our publications (http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/automap/publications.html).
Meta Matrix Text Analysis can be run on a text or a set of texts that were pre-processed with a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus. It enables the classification and analysis of concepts in texts according to the Meta-Matrix model ontology and categories of the resulting inter and intra-related sub-matrices (Diesner & Carley, 2005), Meta-Matrix Text Analysis and the social systems represented in texts. Meta-matrix based analysis of properties of social systems by investigating the inter and intra-connections between the matrices contained in the meta-matrix (cells in Table 1) can provide insight into the complex structure of social systems.
Before you run Meta-Matrix analysis make sure that you have completed the following actions:
If you wish to analyze a single text, click the Run Analysis menu and select Single Meta Matrix Text Analysis.
If you wish to analyze a set of texts, click the Run Analysis menu and select Multiple Meta Matrix Text Analysis.
The Results will be displayed on P3 on the Map tab and on P4 on the Stat tab respectively. If you had requested additional outputs, those will be generated and stored under the directories specified under the Section Additional Outputs.
If you have analyzed multiple texts, you can browse through the
results and see the related texts.
Results of multiple analyses are automatically saved in a folder named “output” under
the directory where AutoMap 2.0 is installed. This output folder contains a
map file (nameOfText.map) and a stat file (nameOfText.stat) for each text analyzed
as
well as stat_output.xls file a that contains the stats of all texts.
The “Stat Output” folder is overwritten with every new analysis you
run. So if you want to save the results of a current “Stat Output” folder
just rename the folder.
2.1 Example for Meta Matrix Text Analysis
An extract from the Our Text I.txt was used as input:
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
The text was pre-processed with the Meta-Matrix-Thesaurus. This are the resulting texts:
| Setting | Resulting text |
| Not Selected - Thesaurus content only (default) | mr . < agent> < agent> dog ate lotus < event> < attribute> am . mrs . < agent> was unhappy with dog . yelled saying < agent resource> impossible dog!" dog kept eating flowers weeds . asked mr . cray stop dog . couldn't . mrs . < agent> planted roses weeded garden . silly dog < attribute> dug up roses looking vole on june < attribute> , < attribute> . weeding was no longer needed . prof . < agent> , mrs . < agent> < attribute> mr . cray met next day < task> plan . john < agent> mrs . < agent> put up scarecrow . thought scare dog . mr . < agent> put up fence . problem solved . then mrs . < agent> planted lotus , < resource> , < resource> , roses . |
Thesaurus content only, Direct Adjacency |
. < agent> < agent> < event> < attribute> . . < agent> . < agent resource> . . . . . < agent> . < attribute> < attribute> < attribute> . . . < agent> . < agent> < attribute> . < task> . < agent> . < agent> . . . < agent> . . . < agent> < resource> < resource> . |
| Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | xxx . < agent> < agent> xxx xxx xxx < event> < attribute> xxx . xxx . < agent> xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx < agent resource> xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx . xxx . xxx . < agent> xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx < attribute> xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx < attribute> < attribute> . xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx . < agent> xxx . < agent> < attribute> xxx . xxx xxx xxx xxx < task> xxx . xxx < agent> xxx . < agent> xxx xxx xxx . xxx xxx xxx . xxx . < agent> xxx xxx . xxx xxx . xxx xxx . < agent> xxx xxx < resource> < resource> xxx . |
Then we run Map Analysis on both texts using AutoMap's default Analysis
Settings. These are the results:
| Not Selected - Thesaurus content only (default) | Thesaurus content only, Direct Adjacency | Thesaurus content only, Rhetorical Adjacency | |
| Map | 1 10 am 1 12 1880 1 1880 weeding 1 am mrs 1 asked mr 1 ate lotus 1 blossom 10 1 brown was 1 carnations daffodils 1 concoct plan 1 couldn't mrs 1 cray stop 1 cray's brown 1 craye put up 1 daffodils roses 1 day concoct 1 dog yelled 1 dug up 1 eating flowers 1 fence problem 1 flowers weeds 1 garden silly 1 impossible dog 1 john darren 1 june 12 1 kept eating 1 longer needed 1 looking vole 1 lotus carnations 1 met next 1 mr craye 1 needed prof 1 next day 1 no longer 1 on june 1 plan john 1 planted roses 1 problem solved 1 prof darren 1 put up 1 put up fence 1 roses weeded 1 saying you 1 scare dog 1 scarecrow thought 1 silly dog 1 solved then 1 stop dog 1 then mrs 1 thought scare 1 unhappy with 1 up scarecrow 1 vole on 1 was unhappy 1 weeded garden 1 weeding was 1 weeds asked 1 with dog 1 yelled saying 1 you impossible 2 brown planted 2 darren mrs 2 mr cray |
1 10 am
|
1 blossom 10 1 brown was 1 carnations daffodils 1 concoct plan 1 couldn't mrs 1 cray stop 1 cray's brown 1 craye put up 1 daffodils roses 1 day concoct 1 dog yelled 1 dug up 1 eating flowers 1 fence problem 1 flowers weeds 1 garden silly 1 impossible dog 1 john darren 1 june 12 1 kept eating 1 longer needed 1 looking vole 1 lotus carnations 1 met next 1 mr craye 1 needed prof 1 next day 1 no longer 1 on june 1 plan john 1 planted roses 1 problem solved 1 prof darren 1 put up 1 put up fence 1 roses weeded 1 saying you 1 scare dog 1 scarecrow thought 1 silly dog 1 solved then 1 stop dog 1 then mrs 1 thought scare 1 unhappy with 1 up scarecrow 1 vole on 1 was unhappy 1 weeded garden 1 weeding was 1 weeds asked 1 with dog 1 yelled saying 1 you impossible 2 brown planted 2 darren mrs 2 mr cray 5 mrs brown |
| Stat | File:
# of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
File: # of concepts analyzed: # of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
File: # of concepts analyzed: # of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
Note: For more information about the impact of coding choices on map analysis results please visit us on the web (http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/automap/publications.html).
Sub Matrix Text Analysis distills one or several sub-networks from the meta-matrix network and retranslates the meta-matrix entities into the text-level concepts that represent these Meta-Matrix categories. This routine enables a more thorough analysis of particular cells of the meta-matrix (Diesner & Carley, 2004c). Sub Matrix Text Analysis can be run on a text or a set of texts that were pre-processed with a Meta-Matrix Thesaurus and from that Sub-Matrices were selected.
Before you run Sub-Matrix analysis make sure that you have completed the following actions:
The user is given the option to exclude entities of any applied ontology from being considered as nodes and thus forming statements, but are considered as attributes of other entities in the ontology that are forming nodes and link into statements. An example would be the category "attribute", which would represent information that is inherent to a certain node. The concept "teacher" or "male" might be considered as attributes that relate to the entity agent.
To use ontologies (in a way ontologies not only represent entities, but also features of entities) follow these steps:
Whether to use NTA or SNTA is a "text-philosophical question" that's answer depends upon what the user wants to measure - a textual network or a social network.
If you wish to analyze a single text,
click the Run
Analysis menu and select Single Meta-Matrix analysis.
If you wish to analyze a set of texts, click
the Run
Analysis menu and select Multiple Meta-Matrix Analysis.
The Results will be displayed on P3 on the Map index
card and on P4 on the Stat index
card.
If you had requested additional outputs, those will be generated and stored under
the directories specified under the Section Additional Outputs.
If you have analyzed multiple texts, you can browse through the
results and see the related texts.
Results of multiple analysis are automatically saved in a folder named “output” under
the directory where AutoMap 2.0 is installed. This output folder contains a map
file (nameOfText.map) and a stat file (nameOfText.stat) for each text analyzed
as
well as stat_output.xls file a that contains the stats of all texts.
The “Stat Output” folder is overwritten with every new analysis you
run. So if you want to save the results of a current “Stat Output” folder
just rename the folder.
3.1 Example for Sub Matrix Text Analysis
This example is based on the example for
Sub Matrix Selection.
Our Text I.txt. was used as input:
Mr. Cray's brown dog ate the lotus blossom at 10 am. Mrs. Brown was unhappy with the dog. She yelled at it saying "You impossible dog!" But the dog kept eating the flowers and weeds. She asked Mr. Cray to stop the dog. He couldn't. Mrs. Brown planted roses and weeded the garden. The silly dog % dug up the roses looking for a vole on June 12, 1880. Weeding was no longer needed.
Prof. Darren, Mrs. Brown & Mr. Cray met the next day to concoct a plan. John Darren and Mrs. Brown put up a scarecrow. She thought it would scare the dog. Mr. Craye put up a fence. Problem solved. Then Mrs. Brown planted lotus, carnations, daffodils, and roses.
The text was pre-processed with the Meta-Matrix-Thesaurus. Then we selected the full meta-matrix. These are the resulting texts:
| Setting | Resulting text |
Select: Knowledge/Agent/Resource |
. dog lotus.. dog. dog flowers.. dog... roses. dog roses,.. .,..... dog..... lotus, carnations, daffodils, roses.
|
| Select: Knowledge/Agent/Resource |
xxx. xxx xxx dog xxx xxx lotus xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx flowers xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx xxx. xxx. xxx xxx roses xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx dog xxx xxx xxx xxx roses xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx, xxx. xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx dog. xxx. xxx xxx xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx. xxx xxx lotus, carnations, daffodils, xxx roses. xxx |
Then we run Map Analysis on both texts using AutoMap's default Analysis Settings. These are the results:
| Map | 1 lotus carnations 1 met the 1 mr craye 1 neededprof darren 1 next day 1 no longer 1 on june 1 plan john 1 planted roses 1 problem solved 1 put up 1 put up a 1 roses looking 1 saying you 1 scare the 1 scarecrow she 1 she yelled 1 silly dog 1 solved then 1 stop the 1 the silly 1 then mrs 1 thought it 1 to stop 1 unhappy with 1 up the 1 vole on 1 was unhappy 1 weeded the 1 weeding was 1 weeds she 1 with the 1 would scare 1 yelled at 1 you impossible 2 brown planted 2 mr cray 4 the dog 5 mrs brown |
1 12 pm 1 13 1880 1 1880 prof 1 and weeds 1 at 12 1 ate the 1 blossom at 1 brown would 1 carnations daffodils 1 cray was 1 cray's brown 1 craye painted 1 daffodils and 1 darren mrs 1 day mrs 1 dinner and 1 discussed how 1 dog the 1 down the 1 eating the 1 fence then 1 fertilized the 1 flowers and 1 following week 1 for the 1 garden on 1 good dog 1 had worked 1 happy with 1 his fence 1 how the 1 it was 1 john darren 1 june 13 1 longer ate 1 lotus carnations 1 met over 1 mr craye 1 next day 1 no longer 1 now happy 1 on june 1 over dinner 1 painted his 1 plan had 1 pleased too 1 pm the 1 prof darren 1 roses and 1 said you 1 scarecrow the 1 scary for 1 she thought 1 stopped eating 1 take down 1 the scarecrow 1 then mrs 1 thought it 1 too scary 1 was too 1 watered the 1 weeds mr 1 week she 1 with the 1 worked john 1 would take 1 you good 2 brown watered 2 mr cray 3 the dog 5 mrs brown |
| Stat | # of concepts analyzed: # of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
# of concepts in statements: # of isolated concepts: # of statements: Density (based on Statements): |
Outputs
Outputs for Map Analysis, Meta Matrix Text Analysis and Sub Matrix Text Analysis
are displayed on P3 on the Semantic Network index card and on P4 on the Stat index
card.
If you have analyzed multiple texts, you can browse
through the results and see the related texts.
Results of multiple analyses are automatically saved in a folder named “output” under
the directory where AutoMap 2.0 is installed. This output folder contains a map
file (nameOfText.map) and a stat file (nameOfText.stat) for each text analyzed
as
well as a stat_output.xls file that contains the stats of all texts. Additional
Outputs will be generated if requested by
the user.
After running analysis, the semantic network will be
displayed on P3 on the Semantic Network Index card.
The semantic network contains one coded statement per line.
If the Frequency item was checked on the Analysis Settings index card
the first column of the semantic network indicates the frequency of every displayed
statement.
Each semantic network generated is automatically saved in a folder named “Stat
Output” under the directory where AutoMap 1.2 is installed. This output
folder contains a semantic network file (nameOfText.map) and a stat file (nameOfText.stat)
for each text analyzed as well as a stat_output.xls file that contains
the stats of all
texts.
1.1 Example for Semantic Network Output
For examples for semantic network files, see the examples for analysis, the Semantic Network of current text index cards.
After running the analysis, the Stat file will be displayed on P4 on
the
Statistics Index Card.
Each stat file generated is automatically saved in a folder named “Stat
Output” under the directory where AutoMap 1.2 is installed. This
output folder contains a map file (nameOfText.map) and a stat file (nameOfText.stat)
for each text analyzed as well as stat_output.xls file a that contains
the stats of all
texts.
Entries in the stat output and explanation:
| Entry | Entry | Explanation |
| File: |
|
Name of the analyzed text file. |
| # of concepts
analyzed: |
unique: | Unique concepts are those that appear
only once in a text; the number of total concepts includes
those that appear more than once in a given text. All concepts are considered that occurred in the texts that were analyzed. |
| total: | ||
| # of concepts in statements: | unique: | Only concepts are considered that linked into statements. |
| total: | ||
| # of isolated concepts: | unique: | Only concepts are considered that did not link into statements. |
| total: | ||
| # of statements: | unique: | Unique statements are those that appear only once in a text; the number of total statements includes those that appear more than once in a given text. |
| total: | ||
density |
unique: |
Unique density is the density of the resulting network based on unique statements, total density respectively is the density of the resulting network based on the total number of statements. |
| total: | ||
|
Analysis Settings |
Punctuation: | The Punctuation option chosen by the user. |
| Window Size: | The Window Size chosen by the user. | |
| Directionality: |
The Directionality option chosen by the user. |
2.1 Example for Statistic Output
For examples of stat files, see the examples for analysis, the Stat of current text index cards.
The
map and the statistic output generated by AutoMap are displayed on P3 and P4,
respectively.
For all types of multiple analysis a lot more outputs
can be generated on demand.
1. Snapshot: Split Input Text Files
Purpose
Split large text files into smaller ones of minimum equal size.
When to apply it: In order to speed up AutoMap coding.
Input from user: Number of words (NW) that each text file should contain after splitting.How it works
Each text will be split at the next sentence mark after the number of words that the user had specified. Thus, each resulting split text will contain at least NW words.
Output
N texts that contain at least NW in directory specified by the user. The resulting texts maintain the original filename plus a counter, starting from 0 and going up to N, where N indicates the largest number of texts that an original text had been split up into.
How To
Click the Tools menu and select Open Text File Splitter. Follow the directions specified in the user interface.
2. Snapshot: Using Compare Maps
Purpose
How To
Click the Tools menu and select Open CompareMap. For further instructions consult the CompareMap User's Guide.
3. Snapshot: Merge DyNetML Files
Purpose
Merge multiple DyNetML files into 1 DyNetML file.
Example
This might be needed for example when DyNetML files that was generated per text during Sub-Matrix Text Analysis need to be consolidated into 1 DyNetML file that represent the entire text set.
Output
1 DyNetML file.
How To
Click the Tools menu and select Open DyNetML File Merger. Follow the directions specified in the user interface.
4. Snapshot: Convert Network Data Formats
Purpose
Convert a file in a specific network data format (CVS, DL, UCINET, DyNetML, VNA) into another network data format.
How To
Click the Tools menu and select Open Matrix Editor. Follow the directions specified in the user interface.
5. Snapshot: Edit Network Data
Purpose
Edit relational data.
How To
Click the Tools menu and select Open Network Data Format Converter. Follow the directions specified in the user interface.
6. Snapshot: Visualize Semantic Networks
Purpose
Visualize mental models and social structure.
How To
Example: Load in DyNetML files created in AutoMap.
Example: Convert DL into VNA files can be visualized in NetDraw. In NetDraw open VNA file: File > Open > VNA text file > complete.
There are two ways to clear all index cards
To exit AutoMap, click the File menu and select Exit.
AutoMap will be closed.
How to cite AutoMap
Carley, K.M., & Diesner, J. (2005). AutoMap: Software for Network
Text Analysis.
For further information on AutoMap please visit: http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/automap
On this web page you will find:
We also provide a online
discussion forum for
AutoMap:
- to discuss questions related to the AutoMap software;
- and get help from other AutoMap users and the developers of the software with
using
the tool.
Questions, Bugs, and Comments
Please contact us:
Dr. Kathleen M. Carley (kathleen.carley@cmu.edu)
Jana Diesner (diesner@cs.cmu.edu)
Technical Writer, Matt De Reno (mjdereno@andrew.cmu.edu)
Carnegie Mellon University
School of Computer Science
Institute for Software Research International (ISRI)
Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS)
5000 Forbes Avenue
1325 Wean Hall
Pittsburgh, PA, 15213
We provide a online
discussion forum for AutoMap:
- To discuss questions related to the AutoMap software.
- And get help from other AutoMap users and the developers of the software with
using
the tool.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett , M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (ac) (2002). UCINET. for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Inc.
Burkart, M. (1997). Thesaurus. In M. Buder, W. Rehfeld, T. Seeger & D. Strauch (Eds.), Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: Ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit, (pp. 160 - 179). 4th edition. München: Saur.
Kathleen M. Carley, 1997, "Extracting Team Mental Models Through Textual Analysis." Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 533-538.
Kathleen M.Carley, 1994, "Extracting Culture through Textual Analysis." Poetics, 22: 291-312.
Kathleen M.Carley and David Kaufer, 1993, "Semantic Connectivity: An Approach for Analyzing Semantic Networks." Communication Theory, 3(3): 183-213.
Kathleen M.Carley, 1993, "Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis." In Marsden P. (Ed), Sociological Methodology, 23: 75-126. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kathleen M. Carley, 1997, "Network Text Analysis: The Network Position of Concepts." Chapter 4 in C. Roberts (Ed.), Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 79-100.
Carley, K.M. & Reminga, J. (2004). ORA: Organization Risk Analyzer. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International, Technical Report.
Carley, K.M. (2003). Dynamic Network Analysis. In R. Breiger, K.M. Carley & P. Pattison (Eds.), Summary of the NRC workshop on social network modeling and analysis, (pp. 133-145). Committee on Human Factors, National Research Council.
Kathleen M.Carley and Michael Palmquist, 1992, "Extracting, Representing and Analyzing Mental Models." Social Forces, 70(3): 601-636
Kathleen M.Carley, 1993, "Content Analysis," in Asher R.E. et al.(Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics . Edinburgh, UK: Pergamon Press. Vol. 2: 725-730.
Diesner, J., & Carley, K.M., 2005. "Exploration of Communication Networks from the Enron Email Corpus," Proceedings of the Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism and Security, SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 2005, pp. 3-14. Newport Beach, CA, April 21-23, 2005.
Jana Diesner, Kathleen M. Carley, 2005, "Revealing Social Structure from Texts: Meta-Matrix Text Analysis as a novel method for Network Text Analysis," In V.K. Narayanan & D.J. Armstrong (Eds.) Causal Mapping for Information Systems and Technology Research: Approaches, Advances, and Illustrations, Chapter 4, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Diesner, J., & Carley, K.M. (2004). AutoMap1.2 - Extract, analyze, represent, and compare mental models from texts. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International, Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-100. URL: http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/isri2004.html (01-22-2004).
Diesner, J., & Carley, K.M. (2005). Revealing Social Structure from Texts: Meta-Matrix Text Analysis as a novel method for Network Text Analysis. Chapter 4 in V.K. Narayanan, & D.J. Armstrong (Eds.), Causal Mapping for Information Systems and Technology Research: Approaches, Advances, and Illustrations (pp.81-108). Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Jurafsky, D., & Marton, J.H. (2000). Speech and Language Processing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
David Kaufer and Kathleen M.Carley, 1993, "Condensation Symbols: Their Variety and Rhetorical Function in Political Discourse." Philosophy and Rhetoric, 26(3): 201-226.
Klein, H. (1997). Classification
of Text Analysis Software. In R. Klar, & O.
Opitz (Eds.), Classification and knowledge organization: Proceedings
of the 20th annual conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation
e.V.,
(pp. 255-261). University of Freiburg , 1996, Berlin , New York : Springer.
1997.
Krovetz, Robert (1995). Word Sense Disambiguation for Large Text Databases.
Unpublished PhD Theis,
University of Massachusetts.
Magnini, B., Negri, M., Prevete, R., & Tanev, H. (2002). A WordNet-based approach to Named Entities Recognition. In Proceedings of SemaNet'02: Building and Using Semantic Networks, (pp. 38-44). Taipei, Taiwan, August 2002.
Mrvar, A. Centrality measures. URL: http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/sola/info4/uvod/part4.pdf ( 06-13-2004 )
Michael Palmquist, Kathleen M. Carley, and Thomas Dale, 1997, "Two applications of automated text analysis: Analyzing literary and non-literary texts." Chapter 10 in C. Roberts (Ed.), Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 171-189.
Popping, R., & Roberts, C.W. (1997). Network Approaches in Text Analysis. In R. Klar & O. Opitz (Eds.), Classification and Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., (pp. 381-898). University of Freiburg , Berlin , New York : Springer.
Porter, M.F. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. I 14 (3): 130-137.
Tsvetovat, M., Reminga, J., & Carley, K.M. (2004). DyNetML: Interchange Format for Rich Social Network Data. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International, CASOS Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-105. URL: http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/isri2004/abstracts/04-105.html .
Zuell, C., & Alexa, M. (2001). Automatisches Codieren von Textdaten. Ein Ueberblick ueber neue Entwicklungen. In W. Wirth & E. Lauf (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse - Perspektiven, Probleme, Potenziale (pp. 303-317). Koeln: Herbert von Halem.
Where to learn to more about Dynamic Network Analysis
Kathleen M. Carley, 2003, “Dynamic Network Analysis” in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, Ronald Breiger, Kathleen Carley, and Philippa Pattison, (Eds.) Committee on Human Factors, National Research Council, National Research Council. Pp. 133-145, Washington, DC.
Kathleen M. Carley, 2002, “Smart Agents and Organizations of the Future” The Handbook of New Media. Edited by Leah Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone, Ch. 12, pp. 206-220, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
Kathleen M. Carley, Jana Diesner, Jeffrey Reminga, Maksim Tsvetovat, 2005-forthcoming, Toward an Interoperable Dynamic Network Analysis Toolkit, DSS Special Issue on Cyberinfrastructure for Homeland Security: Advances in Information Sharing, Data Mining, and Collaboration Systems.